[Zardoz]

And this realates to the show being cancelled???? LOL!

[Damage75]

Originally Posted by Saquist

Your post lacked context. The result was confusion.
Accusations are intrusive and illgoical generalizations to an individual are always erroroneous; exagerative and incomplete.

I can not say why further rejoinder was not offered as I did not see your last post. Thus...this brings you back to my reply to your accusations on this thread. There was no reply because I did not read your statements.
At this point I am pondering the purpose in responding to the reply at all.

Please try to refrain from using "big" words. Just throwing them into a sentence in an attempt to sound "logical" does not work, and makes you sound rather silly.

Simply reply to the thread. You had already done it once. I followed your format, answering every statement. There is no confusion.

[Saquist]

Originally Posted by Zardoz

And this realates to the show being cancelled???? LOL!

It relates to the discussion yet not the actual topic. I would suggest asking Damage where this will ultimately lead to.

Originally Posted by Damage75

Please try to refrain from using "big" words. Just throwing them into a sentence in an attempt to sound "logical" does not work, and makes you sound rather silly.

Simply reply to the thread. You had already done it once. I followed your format, answering every statement. There is no confusion.

I use my vocabulary to the fullest, I am powerless to endow you with the ability to comprehend it. It is your responsibility to expand your own vocabulary. I believe the resources are at your disposal if you wish to add to your education, Damage.

If you do not adapt well to "big" words you are free to excerise your perogative to discontinue. Otherwise your sense of seriousness is not one of my preoccupations.

As to responding to the Tread: I have not seen it since my last comment and I fail to see the logic to continue the discussion in light of your perceptional issues. Nor have you expanded upon why I should pursue the topic with you. The discourse has died. I lack a reason to resurrect it.

[Livingston]

Just don't use the word "crux", Saquist, I hate that word!

[Saquist]

Noted:

[Zardoz]

Originally Posted by Livingston

Just don't use the word "crux", Saquist, I hate that word!

Not even about the crux on a peice of bread?? Oh...that's crust....


Sorry Livingston, couldn't resist....LOL

[Damage75]

Originally Posted by Saquist

It relates to the discussion yet not the actual topic. I would suggest asking Damage where this will ultimately lead to.



I use my vocabulary to the fullest, I am powerless to endow you with the ability to comprehend it. It is your responsibility to expand your own vocabulary. I believe the resources are at your disposal if you wish to add to your education, Damage.

If you do not adapt well to "big" words you are free to excerise your perogative to discontinue. Otherwise your sense of seriousness is not one of my preoccupations.

As to responding to the Tread: I have not seen it since my last comment and I fail to see the logic to continue the discussion in light of your perceptional issues. Nor have you expanded upon why I should pursue the topic with you. The discourse has died. I lack a reason to resurrect it.

I adapt just fine to "big words". I do not adapt to their incorrect usage.

It's like you're writing a statement, then using a thesaurus to change the words, but they don't work in the same context.

[Saquist]

All the word I use I am well acquainted with and the context propper. Yet why make your issues with word usage a part of the thread topic? It is distractive. Let the topic resume.

[Damage75]

Originally Posted by Saquist

All the word I use I am well acquainted with and the context propper. Yet why make your issues with word usage a part of the thread topic? It is distractive. Let the topic resume.

Ummm...because we've been talking about it for the past couple of posts?

LOL...Glad to hear you're easily distracted!

[Zardoz]

Ei Ei O!