The Official Star Trek Movie Forum

The Official Star Trek Movie Forum > Star Trek > Star Trek XI: The Movie > TOS Pasts
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 03-06-2008, 03:39 PM
Saquist's Avatar
Saquist Saquist is offline
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,257
Default

that wouldn't make it star trek really.
They avoided that to such an extent it would seem somewhat sureal.
The closess I remember is the episode where they when to the planet with the flying viruses and his brother and wife die.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-07-2008, 04:21 AM
Zardoz's Avatar
Zardoz Zardoz is offline
Federation Councillor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Somewhere In The Future
Posts: 31,432
Default

Yeah, it would JB.
__________________
"High Priestesses Of Zardoz" By Eliza's Starbase Of Avatars Copyright 2009."
"Zardoz Speaks To You, His Choosen Trek Fans."
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-07-2008, 05:21 AM
MisokaData's Avatar
MisokaData MisokaData is offline
Midshipman
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 11
Default

There is still a lot on the plate for Abrams, the writters, and the actors. When I watch TOS the questions still pops into mind about their pasts. Now in one of the episodes, McCoy mentions that they known each other in the academy and but then Spock would then be assigned to a ship.

To me it just would be logical so at least get a reason why Kirk, McCoy, Spock, Sulu, Scott, Chekov, Uhura, Chapel, and Rand joined the academy in the movie. Yes, I know that Chapel did it to find her fiance. Also, we still dod not know the main argument between Spock and Sarek, Spock's reason for going. We just know that Sarek was dissapointed.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 03-07-2008, 06:07 AM
Zardoz's Avatar
Zardoz Zardoz is offline
Federation Councillor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Somewhere In The Future
Posts: 31,432
Default

McCoy could have been a guest lecturer, or an instructor, during Kirk's Academy days. Since there was a age diffrence between the two, it would be logical conclusion.
__________________
"High Priestesses Of Zardoz" By Eliza's Starbase Of Avatars Copyright 2009."
"Zardoz Speaks To You, His Choosen Trek Fans."
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 03-07-2008, 09:55 AM
Saquist's Avatar
Saquist Saquist is offline
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,257
Default

I assure you it's unlikely they'll address all these questions it's behard enough fitting in the script. Somethings will not be possible because of schedule.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 03-07-2008, 10:24 AM
Zardoz's Avatar
Zardoz Zardoz is offline
Federation Councillor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Somewhere In The Future
Posts: 31,432
Default

I guess we'll find out May 2009.....
__________________
"High Priestesses Of Zardoz" By Eliza's Starbase Of Avatars Copyright 2009."
"Zardoz Speaks To You, His Choosen Trek Fans."
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 03-07-2008, 12:10 PM
sir num nums sir num nums is offline
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sherwood, AR
Posts: 2,357
Default

Dang, just how long would this movie have to be in order to cover everyones past?

I think they have more than enough characters in the movie already, and to try to explore the past of more then Kirk and Spock would be going to far.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 03-07-2008, 03:36 PM
MisokaData's Avatar
MisokaData MisokaData is offline
Midshipman
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 11
Default

2.5 to 3 hours. Hey, honest to Heavan it's damn ruff to do this movie but if there is a chance for some explaination that Gene never gave us in time, then this movie can provide it. It doesn't have to answer everything, that would be illogical.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 03-07-2008, 04:02 PM
When Mugatos Attack's Avatar
When Mugatos Attack When Mugatos Attack is offline
Midshipman
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2
Default

Well, I just hope T'Pol shows up somewhere.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 03-07-2008, 05:17 PM
sir num nums sir num nums is offline
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sherwood, AR
Posts: 2,357
Default

Maybe some of the other past crews could be addressed in the next film.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:33 PM.


Forum theme courtesy of Mark Lambert
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 by Paramount Pictures. STAR TREK and all related
marks and logos are trademarks of CBS Studios Inc. All Rights Reserved.