|
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| View Poll Results: Families on starships - good idea, bad idea? | |||
| A good idea |
|
17 | 60.71% |
| A bad idea |
|
7 | 25.00% |
| Don't really care either way |
|
4 | 14.29% |
| Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
If he had no extraordinary abilities, he would not have sit at the helm and we would have seen him as often as Jake.
He saved the ship once or twice but made plenty of mistakes. And he was still an ordinary kid, he had ordinary romances, ordianry problems with his father figure Picard and it's not like he knew about his, well, let's call it destiny. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
T'was a brief digression. Quote:
He did also learn from mistakes he made (Evolution, Remember Me, The First Duty) and was eventually shown not to be unfailing. The Traveller part? Well, it stretched his destiny a bit, but since it was only three episodes out of the series it wasn't as if it took over the show completely. It's possibly why they made Jake a dull drip in comparison.
__________________
'If the Apocalypse starts, beep me!' - Buffy Summers 'The sky's the limit.....' Jean-Luc Picard, 'All Good Things' courtesy of Saquist
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think that's cool.
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Kids onboard the Enterprise-D fit with the tan interiors, the, um, "interesting" bodysuit uniforms, and the direction of the franchise at the time (Intergalactic Cruise Ship to the stars).
I am fine with it. They pulled it off plausibly enough, though it was a lot more believable on DS9. The writers were aware it was a bit silly to some, which is why the contrast in Yesterday's Enterprise is so immediate and effective. |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just like a wagon train it's a good idea until the Indians attack or some alien relic infects the ship with a computer virus and it suffers a warp core breach like Yamato. I guess that's the chance you take.
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
If Starfleet officers don't want to take children with them, they don't have to. Free choice never hurts.
If the kids were to make the choice, I can't imagine that much of them would want to remain on "safe" mother Earth (where every now and then alien probes, nasty cyborgs, shapeshifters or genocidal madmen come by ). |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
I was never a fan of the families on board Enterprise. It would be a different thing for me if maybe they were colonists or something along those lines, but a ship that has as one of it's main functions defense of Federation space it really made little sense. I know Gene had the idea that the ship would be out exploring for years at a time, but that isn't what really was presented in TNG. So for me it didn't work. I actually think something more along the lines of Enterprise C is what should have been used in TNG.
__________________
![]() ![]() |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
There might be a rationale behind it as parents who defend their children are the fiercest enemies. And parents might eagerly take over the night-shift to be able to spend more time with their kids.
![]() |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
I wonder if the holodecks had somekind of age verification software written into them to keep the young ones from experiencing things they shouldn't
__________________
![]() ![]() |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Sure, the computer can recognize your voice.
If families are aboard, sexual tension will be lower and fewer officers will play those holosuite-style programs. And you won't need so much of the special holodeck disinfection and cleaning spray. ![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|