The Official Star Trek Movie Forum

The Official Star Trek Movie Forum > Star Trek > Star Trek XI: The Movie > this is what i think is gunna happen with the future star trek movies
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 04-23-2009, 04:25 PM
Beetlescott's Avatar
Beetlescott Beetlescott is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 1,645
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpfeiffer001 View Post
i think that its going to be like a trilogy. but i also feel that posible trailogy will be like yesterdays enterprise if anyone has seen that episode from tng. i think if there is a third one they will know that the timeline that is going is not the way that it is suposed to happen and they will have to find some way of getting back to the normal timeline. what does everyone else think?
I have said all along that I felt there would have to be a way for that to happen!!!!
__________________
LET'S MAKE SURE HISTORY NEVER FORGETS THE NAME ENTERPRISE!!!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-23-2009, 07:32 PM
OneBuckFilms's Avatar
OneBuckFilms OneBuckFilms is offline
Commander
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 909
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beetlescott View Post
I have said all along that I felt there would have to be a way for that to happen!!!!
Not likely to happen.

You don't completely build a franchise from the ground up, at the cost of $150 Million, to do a 3 movie bait-and-switch.
__________________
Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-23-2009, 08:21 PM
Magnum Magnum is offline
Lieutenant, Junior Grade
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 185
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePhaige View Post
So TOS is called TOS, and The Next generation Could be the Roddenbermanprise, and DS9 could be Pillermoorebermanprise, or TWOK could be the Meyersprise....Really this term Abramsprise just gets me...heres a novel idea, how bout we just call it New Trek...lol

No the term Abramsprise or Abramstrek is very fitting. Abrams has destroyed Star Trek. Thank God for the Fans who will still make films based on the Correct Star Trek. I do not like universes based on Fluff or who pretend to be Star Wars. As I said the Ship except for the Star Trek 6 Primary hull, resembles Star Wars ships. and In Star Wars they showed the ancester to the Star Destroyer being built on the ground.

Abramsverse Abramsprise will never be Star Trek.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-23-2009, 09:04 PM
OneBuckFilms's Avatar
OneBuckFilms OneBuckFilms is offline
Commander
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 909
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magnum View Post
No the term Abramsprise or Abramstrek is very fitting. Abrams has destroyed Star Trek. Thank God for the Fans who will still make films based on the Correct Star Trek. I do not like universes based on Fluff or who pretend to be Star Wars. As I said the Ship except for the Star Trek 6 Primary hull, resembles Star Wars ships. and In Star Wars they showed the ancester to the Star Destroyer being built on the ground.

Abramsverse Abramsprise will never be Star Trek.
Have you seen the movie? How do you know he's destroyed anything?

From the reviews of both fans and non-fans alike, he may well have saved and rejuvinated Star Trek.
__________________
Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-23-2009, 10:25 PM
Samuel Samuel is offline
Vice Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,883
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magnum View Post
No the term Abramsprise or Abramstrek is very fitting. Abrams has destroyed Star Trek. Thank God for the Fans who will still make films based on the Correct Star Trek. I do not like universes based on Fluff or who pretend to be Star Wars. As I said the Ship except for the Star Trek 6 Primary hull, resembles Star Wars ships. and In Star Wars they showed the ancester to the Star Destroyer being built on the ground.

Abramsverse Abramsprise will never be Star Trek.
Just.... wow.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-23-2009, 11:39 PM
mego_mcCoy's Avatar
mego_mcCoy mego_mcCoy is offline
Ensign
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 63
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magnum View Post
No the term Abramsprise or Abramstrek is very fitting. Abrams has destroyed Star Trek. Thank God for the Fans who will still make films based on the Correct Star Trek. I do not like universes based on Fluff or who pretend to be Star Wars. As I said the Ship except for the Star Trek 6 Primary hull, resembles Star Wars ships. and In Star Wars they showed the ancester to the Star Destroyer being built on the ground.

Abramsverse Abramsprise will never be Star Trek.
lets see...no he didn't destroy star trek. he improved it, made it better, more excitinng. infact while i am a virgin of trek and gotten to watch some of the original series and the next generation. he just exspands the universe. and so long as i am a new fan i will support the new star trek.

its people like you who ruin the fun of STAR TREK.
__________________
Quote:
Your hatred for STARTREK XI is pointless and illogical.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-24-2009, 04:33 AM
I-Am-Zim I-Am-Zim is offline
Vice Admiral
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North Carolina, USA, Earth
Posts: 3,432
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mego_mcCoy View Post
lets see...no he didn't destroy star trek. he improved it, made it better, more excitinng. infact while i am a virgin of trek and gotten to watch some of the original series and the next generation. he just exspands the universe. and so long as i am a new fan i will support the new star trek.

its people like you who ruin the fun of STAR TREK.
Some may beg to differ on that point. He may very well have destroyed TOS as we know it. He is creating a new TOS that is completely different, at least in appearance and sequence of events, from the Star Trek that we have known for the past 43 years. However, the NuTrek created by Abrams may well be more exciting and action packed than TOS or TNG. But action and explosions don't necessarily make it Star Trek. Don't get me wrong, I like action and explosions. But that's not the core of Star Trek. Brilliant strategies and character interaction and development as well as good, compelling storylines are what have made Trek so enduring. How many other TV series do you know of that have lasted for 43 years, 5 spinoff series, and 10 movies??? None that I am aware of.

I am very interested to see how close to the real Star Trek this movie will be. So I am looking forward to seeing it despite my misgivings about the direction that Abrams is taking the Trek that I grew up with.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 04-24-2009, 05:34 AM
RedShirtsRuS's Avatar
RedShirtsRuS RedShirtsRuS is offline
Lieutenant Commander
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 754
Default

Magnum is the only person I know who has seen the movie and doesn't like it.

And that "fluff" word is starting to get old. Go into detail dammit!
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 04-24-2009, 05:37 AM
Biggest Capt. Kirk Fan's Avatar
Biggest Capt. Kirk Fan Biggest Capt. Kirk Fan is offline
Lieutenant, Junior Grade
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 200
Default

can we please discuss this topic after the movie is RELEASED.
__________________


"I was out saving the galaxy when your grandfather was in diapers. Besides the galaxy owes me one" Captain James T. Kirk 2371
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 04-24-2009, 05:49 AM
JSnyder4's Avatar
JSnyder4 JSnyder4 is offline
Commander
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 942
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedShirtsRuS View Post
And that "fluff" word is starting to get old. Go into detail dammit!
Gamers use the word "fluff" to indicate "story"; and "crunch" to indicate "numbers" (rules).

In that context, ST09 has too much story/characterization and not enough number crunching/scientific sounding technobabble to be Star Trek.
__________________
"I go online sometimes, but everyone's spelling is really bad, and it's... depressing."
"Tact is just not saying true stuff. I'll pass"
"A sacrifice a day keeps Jesus away"

Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:26 PM.


Forum theme courtesy of Mark Lambert
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 by Paramount Pictures. STAR TREK and all related
marks and logos are trademarks of CBS Studios Inc. All Rights Reserved.