|
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think Worf was shifting between the universes, not time travelling as such. He stayed in the same time, but travelled through multiple versions of how his life was at that time based on the decisions he could have made along the way.
I think part of Quantum says something similar about the way the universes are created.
__________________
'If the Apocalypse starts, beep me!' - Buffy Summers 'The sky's the limit.....' Jean-Luc Picard, 'All Good Things' courtesy of Saquist
|
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think that's the difference though...he wasn't shifting to other universes that showed him what his life was based on his decisions....it was just showing him in different universes...he didn't cause all of those changes.
You need to have a focal point that affects everything if changed. I think Nero going back in time at the right moment is what changed the timeline. You can probably go back in time and have little hiccups or burps in the timeline, but when you hit that right focal point, you DRASTICALLY change history.
__________________
![]() You people have ruined "Star Trek The Next Generation" for me. You are absolutely the most insufferable group of jackasses I have ever had the misfortune of spending an extended period of time with. I hope you all f@*#! die. - Stewie after spending the day with the TNG cast. |
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Speaking of the "Temporal Cold War", what ever became of that? Was it ever fully resolved?
|
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Except that's the only way this makes sense. TPTB have said that the prme timeline continues to exist after Nero and Spock arrive in the 23rd century. Now in every single episode and movie of Star Trek that has ever dealt with altering the past, it is understood that the previous timeline is erased. That's the whole point of following the Borg back in FC; if the prime timeline would have continued on, who cares if they assimilate earth in the past? Now granted, Star Trek isn't always consistent with time travel, but as far as changing the past is concerned, this is always the case. The only way to reconcile this is to say that the Abramsverse is an alternate universe.
|
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
TREK IS TREK. WHATEVER THE TIMELINE!
The next TV Series should be called STARFLEET! |
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Haha, just kidding! My point was larger: the writer, Jerome Bixby, always intended the Mirror universe to be pre-existing way back in 1967 when the TOS episode was created. It had it's own history of events, etc. Thus the precedent was set in TREK lore long before ENTERPRISE re-cycled the original idea for its own adaptation. Speaking theoretically: had ENT never made their Mirror episode, the (pre-)existence of a true parellel/alternate universe to TREK-prime was established quite clearly. ENT merely picked up a thread long ago woven by TOS, confirming what had already been established. And it was still done better the first time. That aside, I'm personally not convinced that a different look for Delta Vega and a few gray hairs on Pike constitute proof that this Abramsverse already existed before Nero and Spock arrive in it. Nor do they rule it out, in all fairness. I'll get a better idea when I see the whole film.
__________________
MISSION:TREK's in-depth review of STAR TREK Proud member of the Friends of Zardoz Association. Avatar courtesy of Eliza's House of Avatars with three convenient locations near you. Free balloons for the kids! |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Let P(t, u) be the proposition that at time t in universe u, James T. Kirk resembles the 20th century actor William Shatner. If what you say is true, then: P(23rd century, TOS universe) && !P(23rd century, TOS universe) But as any first year computer science student will tell you, this is necessarily false. It obviously can't be the case that history both did and did not change in a given universe; that's just incoherent. And Stargate, while at times entertaining, makes even less logical sense than Star Trek. |
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
This is where things get confusing interchanging "timeline" and "universe". For them to exist in parallel, they would likely be two universes.
I think -- perhaps -- it's simpler to use timeline in discussions since we are talking about events earlier in time than where we "are" in the prime universe. Orci and others have stated that the events of TOS -> continue existing aside from this time travel story line. If the two co-exist, this would seem to eliminate the opportunity for one past to 'erase' the future already seen. This is also why I think that the two will not be 'reconciled', because they exist on different (but similar) planes of existence, and continue forward with different, separate outcomes unique to themselves. Hey, if you really want to scramble your gray matter, try figuring out all the 'universes' in the TERMINATOR franchise! Talk about your core melting down! ![]()
__________________
MISSION:TREK's in-depth review of STAR TREK Proud member of the Friends of Zardoz Association. Avatar courtesy of Eliza's House of Avatars with three convenient locations near you. Free balloons for the kids! |
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
or we have multiple parallel timelines in a single Universe which can accessed by the certain types of astronomical events such as the described in the Countdown Comix, which do not create access to an alternate Universe with multiple alternate timelines.
__________________
TREK IS TREK. WHATEVER THE TIMELINE!
The next TV Series should be called STARFLEET! |
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|