The Official Star Trek Movie Forum

The Official Star Trek Movie Forum > Star Trek > Star Trek XI: The Movie > New Props more Realistic???
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 04-14-2009, 12:52 PM
omegaman's Avatar
omegaman omegaman is offline
Admiral
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Penrith NSW Australia
Posts: 4,613
Default

Need to hold em to know either way.
__________________
TREK IS TREK. WHATEVER THE TIMELINE!

The next TV Series should be called STARFLEET!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-14-2009, 12:55 PM
Jim in St. Louis's Avatar
Jim in St. Louis Jim in St. Louis is offline
Lieutenant Commander
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 886
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dominus of Megadeus View Post
Can't say...The photos to the right are actual Playmate toys. When Paramount pictures comes out with props from the actual movie, I can comment.
The ones on the left are toys too, Art Asylum / Diamond Select. They were just going for accuracy. So much so that these toys were used in Star Trek Enterprise episodes.
__________________
jim
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-14-2009, 01:41 PM
Cpt.JamesKirk's Avatar
Cpt.JamesKirk Cpt.JamesKirk is offline
Midshipman
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6
Default Using Kinder-Surpise-Toys in Star Trex XI

Hello. What I do not understand is, why was a completly new ship designed when it plays at first at the original timeline of Ltd. James T. Kirk? The 60's Enterprise hadn't changed her look hardly from Cpt. April, over Pike till Cpt. James T.Kirk...... Hm. The story would be ok, but the rest of this, what I'd seen until now, doesn't make me happy. I'm not the person, to juge new things, but here........ I love it, that here ten days later Illuminati will be shown in theatre so I know for what I will spend my money . I'm sorry, if you do not agree with my oppinion, but we are living in a land of a free mind. But I will have a look to this movie, because it is also Star Trek.
__________________
"Sie werden immer menschlicher, Mr. Spock!"
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-14-2009, 01:43 PM
NCC-73515's Avatar
NCC-73515 NCC-73515 is offline
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
Posts: 7,229
Default

New timeline because of altered history -> New ship designs and technology.
__________________


"English! I thought I dreamed hearing it!"?
Khan, Space Seed (TOS)

Brought to you in living color by NCC.
-= first fan member =-

Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-14-2009, 01:46 PM
Cpt.JamesKirk's Avatar
Cpt.JamesKirk Cpt.JamesKirk is offline
Midshipman
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6
Default

Hm,I think that was the reason that Star Trek Enterprise is out of production. To much new in such a thing isn't good. Look to "Das Schweigen der Lämmer" und "Roter Drache" with Antony Hopkins.
__________________
"Sie werden immer menschlicher, Mr. Spock!"
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-14-2009, 01:51 PM
Commodore Ismay's Avatar
Commodore Ismay Commodore Ismay is offline
Ensign
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 45
Default

NCC 73515 no comments at the time ?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-14-2009, 02:01 PM
NCC-73515's Avatar
NCC-73515 NCC-73515 is offline
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
Posts: 7,229
Default

You expect a comment within 5 min?
Read my updated sig.
__________________


"English! I thought I dreamed hearing it!"?
Khan, Space Seed (TOS)

Brought to you in living color by NCC.
-= first fan member =-

Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-14-2009, 02:46 PM
omegaman's Avatar
omegaman omegaman is offline
Admiral
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Penrith NSW Australia
Posts: 4,613
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cpt.JamesKirk View Post
Hello. What I do not understand is, why was a completly new ship designed when it plays at first at the original timeline of Ltd. James T. Kirk? The 60's Enterprise hadn't changed her look hardly from Cpt. April, over Pike till Cpt. James T.Kirk...... Hm. The story would be ok, but the rest of this, what I'd seen until now, doesn't make me happy. I'm not the person, to juge new things, but here........ I love it, that here ten days later Illuminati will be shown in theatre so I know for what I will spend my money . I'm sorry, if you do not agree with my oppinion, but we are living in a land of a free mind. But I will have a look to this movie, because it is also Star Trek.
Fair enough. At least you are prepared to give the new movie a go. Good on you.
__________________
TREK IS TREK. WHATEVER THE TIMELINE!

The next TV Series should be called STARFLEET!
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-14-2009, 03:27 PM
Lt. Fordman's Avatar
Lt. Fordman Lt. Fordman is offline
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Battle Creek, MI
Posts: 265
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tomcatjosh View Post
No way. The new phaser in the movie will be more futuristic. The TOS phaser looked like the producers went to the local dup and made it with things from there.
I beg to differ, if you ask me the one from the new movie looks rather "toyish". The one from the original series does not look like it came from a dump.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-14-2009, 03:29 PM
omegaman's Avatar
omegaman omegaman is offline
Admiral
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Penrith NSW Australia
Posts: 4,613
Default

I prefer the TOS version to the XII version.
__________________
TREK IS TREK. WHATEVER THE TIMELINE!

The next TV Series should be called STARFLEET!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:43 PM.


Forum theme courtesy of Mark Lambert
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 by Paramount Pictures. STAR TREK and all related
marks and logos are trademarks of CBS Studios Inc. All Rights Reserved.