The Official Star Trek Movie Forum

The Official Star Trek Movie Forum > Star Trek > Off Topic Discussions > Movies made for fans:FAIL! Watchman drops 71% in 2nd week box office!
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-14-2009, 10:44 AM
tomcatjosh's Avatar
tomcatjosh tomcatjosh is offline
Vice Admiral
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,800
Default

Good point!
__________________


Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-14-2009, 11:21 AM
jla1987's Avatar
jla1987 jla1987 is offline
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,479
Default

I concur. This is a very similar situation to the Batman & Robin to Batman Begins timeframe.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-14-2009, 11:30 AM
Captain Tom Coughlin's Avatar
Captain Tom Coughlin Captain Tom Coughlin is offline
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USS Meadowlands
Posts: 10,870
Default

Paramount must be somewhat nervous right now with the economy the way it is, an this movie only two months away.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-14-2009, 11:47 AM
Commodore's Avatar
Commodore Commodore is offline
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Starbase 24
Posts: 2,511
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wildone_106 View Post
This pretty much PROVES that movies made for fans DO-NOT-WORK in the sense of drawing in a mass audience. The geeks went out and saw this the 1st week, word of mouth spreads and the general audience is not getting it.
Im glad Trek is'nt trying to appease the canonista's on this.
You started this tread just to slam "the canonistas", didn't you?
__________________
Free your mind, and the rest will follow.
--En Vogue
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-14-2009, 12:06 PM
Mister2's Avatar
Mister2 Mister2 is offline
Lieutenant, Junior Grade
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 147
Default

Watchmen blew ballz... And showed a lot of blue ballz....
__________________
"I once tracked a mouse through Jefferies tube 32"


my lug nuts require more torque than your honda puts out
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-14-2009, 01:08 PM
MrQ1701's Avatar
MrQ1701 MrQ1701 is offline
Vice Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Espanola, New Mexico
Posts: 3,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wildone_106 View Post

Now imagine Im not a fan of Trek and saw a version of it that all the hardcore canonista's are calling for? It would be the same reaction, BO numbers would plummet like this ones have.

I don't believe this is necessarily true. If you bother to actually read all the threads on the subject, no "canonista" has called for more than minor tweaks in continuety and design changes. The way the bridge looks or the design of the new ship should have no effect of movie ticket sales, but it could have made fans happy if they had stuck to a more "known" tyoe design. I am not a canonite, by far, but I unnderstand the complaints from others that feel things should have been more like the original. Ultimately, this movie will succeed or fail based on whether or not it has a good story and can keep people's attention throughout it's runtime.
__________________
To secure the peace is to prepare for war. -Metallica
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-14-2009, 01:19 PM
sraviik's Avatar
sraviik sraviik is offline
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: COOKIES
Posts: 413
Default

and if you gave them all their minor tweaks then you'd have one huge fat change to the movie completely changing it. so that its no longer recognizable as the JJverse. not to mention if he starts giving to one group of canonistas then he's got to give to all of them.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-14-2009, 01:24 PM
ThePhaige's Avatar
ThePhaige ThePhaige is offline
Lieutenant Commander
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: florida
Posts: 618
Default

Watchmen was a strange one, had a very B quality to me. Effects didn't impress me either. The story might be a bit too convoluted for the general audience.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-14-2009, 01:30 PM
Saquist's Avatar
Saquist Saquist is offline
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,257
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tomcatjosh View Post
TDK?????Or Begins?
Neither.
He has to be talking about Batman Forever or Batman and Robin.
Those movies were fans service. But Jim is wrong. Fans made for movies do tend to work. Star Trek has been done for fans for a long time. From the First to the 6th Movies they were reasonably profitable. But it's when you expect fan movies to appeal to everyone at the big budget level is where they fail. They have to. The 200 million dollar budget is always wrong for fan directed movies.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-14-2009, 01:35 PM
MrQ1701's Avatar
MrQ1701 MrQ1701 is offline
Vice Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Espanola, New Mexico
Posts: 3,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sraviik View Post
and if you gave them all their minor tweaks then you'd have one huge fat change to the movie completely changing it. so that its no longer recognizable as the JJverse. not to mention if he starts giving to one group of canonistas then he's got to give to all of them.
That's funny. I love how people use the "if I do this for you then I'll have to do it for everyone" excuse. That's all it is, an EXCUSE.

Let me set a few things straight before I continue: I have NOT prejudged this movie, nor do I wish it to fail. I am open to the changes in design and the whole "reboot" thing. I am open to more action and more sexyness for Trek. I am a fan of Star Trek: Enterprise. I say these things because there are fans, "canonites", that did NOT like ENT based on some the same complaints they have about this new movie. Although I do NOT agree with many of those complaints, I understand where they are coming from.

Many of the complaints are actually details in design, a few minor backstory "errors", and what seems to be the gradual "dumbing down" of Trek in order to make it less "nerdy".

Would it have been that hard to make an updated version of the 1701 without completely redrawing it's lines? Is it really that hard to make the bridge look "cool" without making it look like a darn I-store? "Oooo00, Ahhhhhh, look at the neat 'new' viewscreen, you can see thru it!! WOW!", (that was meant to be sarcatic). I think the fans that have complained about various aspects, what we have seen so far, have valid arguments and should NOT be blown off as nutty fans. It was NOT impossible to make things a little easier to "swallow" for the old school fans.
__________________
To secure the peace is to prepare for war. -Metallica

Last edited by MrQ1701 : 03-14-2009 at 01:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:13 PM.


Forum theme courtesy of Mark Lambert
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 by Paramount Pictures. STAR TREK and all related
marks and logos are trademarks of CBS Studios Inc. All Rights Reserved.