The Official Star Trek Movie Forum

The Official Star Trek Movie Forum > Star Trek > Star Trek XI: The Movie > Good News! Star Trek Xii And Xiii
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 04-17-2008, 05:06 AM
Tribble-eater's Avatar
Tribble-eater Tribble-eater is offline
Lieutenant, Junior Grade
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: In the worst place imaginable
Posts: 130
Default

I see a lot of people were debating what the other movies might be called since this one is just Star Trek
I have one response to that
"Don't worry there are plenty of letters in the alphabet "

I too hope for Trek to Continue i am so starved for New trek that I have gone to the Fan sites and was pleasantly surprised to find some quality productions considering its fan based

I think its time for the New trekkers and even non trekkers to experience the grit of TOS
I still think Kirk was the ultimate
Picard was too much of a dplomat most of the time and need I remind you he actually cried in a number of episodes not to mention one movie
There is just something about a captain crying that doesn't sit right for me

Bring on TOS x 3 Yeah!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 04-17-2008, 05:16 AM
Zardoz's Avatar
Zardoz Zardoz is offline
Federation Councillor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Somewhere In The Future
Posts: 31,432
Default

LOl good words...
__________________
"High Priestesses Of Zardoz" By Eliza's Starbase Of Avatars Copyright 2009."
"Zardoz Speaks To You, His Choosen Trek Fans."
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 04-17-2008, 09:13 AM
Datalore's Avatar
Datalore Datalore is offline
Lieutenant, Junior Grade
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 190
Default

If vulcans are suppost to look like romulans, then there are probly some vulcans with the ridges.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 04-17-2008, 09:17 AM
Zardoz's Avatar
Zardoz Zardoz is offline
Federation Councillor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Somewhere In The Future
Posts: 31,432
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Datalore View Post
If vulcans are suppost to look like romulans, then there are probly some vulcans with the ridges.
Makes sense to me.
__________________
"High Priestesses Of Zardoz" By Eliza's Starbase Of Avatars Copyright 2009."
"Zardoz Speaks To You, His Choosen Trek Fans."
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 04-17-2008, 09:30 AM
MissionTrek08's Avatar
MissionTrek08 MissionTrek08 is offline
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,562
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Datalore View Post
If vulcans are suppost to look like romulans, then there are probly some vulcans with the ridges.
I hear Ruffles have them too.
__________________

MISSION:TREK's in-depth review of STAR TREK


Proud member of the Friends of Zardoz Association. Avatar courtesy of Eliza's House of Avatars with three convenient locations near you. Free balloons for the kids!
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 04-17-2008, 09:37 AM
Zardoz's Avatar
Zardoz Zardoz is offline
Federation Councillor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Somewhere In The Future
Posts: 31,432
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MissionTrek08 View Post
I hear Ruffles have them too.
Yes, but to Romulans and Vulcans with ridges hold dip as well as those without?
__________________
"High Priestesses Of Zardoz" By Eliza's Starbase Of Avatars Copyright 2009."
"Zardoz Speaks To You, His Choosen Trek Fans."
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 10-05-2009, 01:14 PM
starwarsrcks's Avatar
starwarsrcks starwarsrcks is offline
Vice Admiral
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 3,062
Default

well what do you think the sequel should be about
__________________



Space is disease and dangerous wrapped in darkness and silence-Leonard Bones McCoy
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 10-05-2009, 01:16 PM
Kaboom's Avatar
Kaboom Kaboom is offline
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 425
Default

Whatever it is, it could probably merit a new thread for discussion instead of bumping one that was SIX MONTHS OLD.

As Bones would say, "good god, man!"
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 10-05-2009, 02:21 PM
jla1987's Avatar
jla1987 jla1987 is offline
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,483
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaboom View Post
Whatever it is, it could probably merit a new thread for discussion instead of bumping one that was SIX MONTHS OLD.

As Bones would say, "good god, man!"
Correction: one year and six months.

Bones would have a tidbit for you before bumping such an old topic: "Now wait just a damn minute."
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 10-05-2009, 05:23 PM
JSnyder4's Avatar
JSnyder4 JSnyder4 is offline
Commander
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 942
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaboom View Post
Whatever it is, it could probably merit a new thread for discussion instead of bumping one... <age of thread not a relevant factor>
As Bones would say, "good god, man!"
Not precisely a fair assessment now is that?

If she had started a new one on the same topic (as this apparently is) someone would have "helpfully" pointed out that she should have done a search and continued that discussion by posting in that thread...

So which is it?
Start new and be helpfully directed to search for an older thread or do what is suggested and get mocked for the thread necromancy?

You decide.
__________________
"I go online sometimes, but everyone's spelling is really bad, and it's... depressing."
"Tact is just not saying true stuff. I'll pass"
"A sacrifice a day keeps Jesus away"

Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:05 AM.


Forum theme courtesy of Mark Lambert
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 by Paramount Pictures. STAR TREK and all related
marks and logos are trademarks of CBS Studios Inc. All Rights Reserved.