The Official Star Trek Movie Forum

The Official Star Trek Movie Forum > Star Trek > Star Trek XI: The Movie > Thoughts about Star Trek 11
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-04-2009, 09:51 AM
Commodore Ismay's Avatar
Commodore Ismay Commodore Ismay is offline
Ensign
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 45
Default

Complete Contruktion Error the Warp Pylons start In the shuttle Bay, I would be part of my grandmother, not even as a pepper mill to offer.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-04-2009, 10:23 AM
Saquist's Avatar
Saquist Saquist is offline
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,257
Default

I'm surprised you noticed that aswell.
My attention was brought to it by another member.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-04-2009, 11:03 AM
Cannibal's Avatar
Cannibal Cannibal is offline
Lieutenant, Junior Grade
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 217
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Commodore Ismay View Post
Complete Contruktion Error the Warp Pylons start In the shuttle Bay, I would be part of my grandmother, not even as a pepper mill to offer.
Um.... what??
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-04-2009, 11:07 AM
CAPTAIN MOUSE's Avatar
CAPTAIN MOUSE CAPTAIN MOUSE is offline
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Placerville,CA
Posts: 2,564
Default

New thread, same story. I know this is going to sound like I am beating a dead horse but there is nothing wrong with the design of the new ENTERPRISE.(not the "Abrams-prise or other dorky monikers) Just because it is not a re-creation of the Matt Jefferies 60's Enterprise centimeter by centimeter, does not mean it has not retained the overall look of the designs past. Does it really matter if the pylons are further back on the main hull? Not Really, no. Does it really matter that the nacelles do not look like lit cigarettes anymore? Actually they look better now, lots of curves and symetry. (Unlike the static look in the 60's. A discarded couple of paper towel rolls would have sufficed.) To me and many others this new Enterprise is sleek and sturdy looking, with a powerful and elegant flair. So while the so called "canonistas" sit around whining about how their beloved Enterprise is now bastardized and how their paltry lives are now ruined forever...The rest of us are going to have a grand adventure to enjoy.
__________________
CAN YOU CATCH SECOND HAND STUPIDITY? OR SHOULD I BE CONCERNED ABOUT THE WATER HERE? - JEFF DUNHAM
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-04-2009, 11:11 AM
jtrek79's Avatar
jtrek79 jtrek79 is offline
Vice Admiral
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Athens,Greece
Posts: 3,330
Default

captain mouse,bless u my friend
__________________
B E H O L D T H E N A R A D A
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-04-2009, 11:21 AM
Commodore Ismay's Avatar
Commodore Ismay Commodore Ismay is offline
Ensign
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 45
Default

You mean our live is paltry???
You are paltry, how much enterprise should be in this universe, it give, gave and will given only one NCC-1701. And this Crap is it definitly NOT.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-04-2009, 11:24 AM
jtrek79's Avatar
jtrek79 jtrek79 is offline
Vice Admiral
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Athens,Greece
Posts: 3,330
Default

what are u talking about , this is the ncc-1701
__________________
B E H O L D T H E N A R A D A
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-04-2009, 11:25 AM
Commodore Ismay's Avatar
Commodore Ismay Commodore Ismay is offline
Ensign
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 45
Default

You mean this crap looks good because its looks modern, what whould happen if James Cameron the Titanic from the 1997 Movie styled like the Modern Queen Mary 2 with 3 Funnels....
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-04-2009, 11:29 AM
Triblfied's Avatar
Triblfied Triblfied is offline
Lieutenant, Junior Grade
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 162
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Commodore Ismay View Post
You mean this crap looks goog because its looks modern, what whould happen if James Cameron the Titanic from the 1997 Movie styled like the Modern Queen Mary 2 with 3 Funnels....
Thats a totally different story. James Cameron went into that movie saying he wanted the Titanic to be as accurate as possible. Abrams made no such guarantees. This is HIS vision of the future, not yours. Deal with it. In fact, dont watch it because you will be whining the whole time...
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-04-2009, 11:33 AM
Commodore Ismay's Avatar
Commodore Ismay Commodore Ismay is offline
Ensign
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 45
Default

I wonder how the Rights holder, The family of Mr Gene Roddenbery could give green light to this crap....
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:46 AM.


Forum theme courtesy of Mark Lambert
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 by Paramount Pictures. STAR TREK and all related
marks and logos are trademarks of CBS Studios Inc. All Rights Reserved.