The Official Star Trek Movie Forum

The Official Star Trek Movie Forum > Star Trek > General Star Trek Discussions > Is the number 9 or its multiples significant? Or are there others?
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-05-2008, 03:23 PM
Trekkie's Avatar
Trekkie Trekkie is offline
Ensign
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 91
Default Is the number 9 or its multiples significant? Or are there others?

If there are discussions about the significance (if any) of the number 9 in the Star Trek 'verse, I didn't pay attention to 'em until now. So if there is some explanation/discussion about this subject elsewhere, could ya direct me to it? That would be great!

Anyway, the main question is this: Is the number 9 or its multiples significant somehow whenever it's used in the Star Trek 'verse?

If it is significant, why? For instance, was the number 9 Roddenberry's favorite number? I just happened to notice it because, for some reason, in another show that I appreciate, HEROES, the number 9 is supposed to be significant.

Actually, there are only a few nines or multiples that I can think of off the top of my head (though there are probably tons more), actually: NCC-1701, Deep Space 9, Seven of Nine...

Then, just searchin' startrek.com, I found these random ones (and including an explanation about the "1701" designation first):
The reason for the letter and number designation for the Enterprise
Seven of Nine was from Tendara Colony, SD 25479
The U.S.S. Defiant NX-74205
The U.S.S. Defiant NCC-1764 had an end in 2268:
Quote:
Caught in a spatial interphase in 2268, near Tholian territory, the U.S.S. Defiant was lost between dimensions for several hours, until it finally faded forever into interspace.
Actually there are a few ships whose number designations are multiples of 3, at least, also. Well, I'm probably making somethin' outta nothing, but I thought I'd ask.

If I am barkin' up the wrong tree, are there other numbers that "mean" something in the Star Trek 'verse, or are put in there for a reason?

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-05-2008, 03:33 PM
NCC-73515's Avatar
NCC-73515 NCC-73515 is offline
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
Posts: 7,229
Default

47 has a far greater significance in TNG and VOY...
One example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SPoiH0JlQ9A
__________________


"English! I thought I dreamed hearing it!"?
Khan, Space Seed (TOS)

Brought to you in living color by NCC.
-= first fan member =-

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-05-2008, 06:24 PM
LCARS 24's Avatar
LCARS 24 LCARS 24 is offline
Lieutenant Commander
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 640
Default

The number 33 hex (51 decimal) is significant in the VOY LCARS color codes. The R, G, and B values are multiples of that. They're somewhat different, however, in TNG, ENT, and some of DS9.

The buzz about 47 is covered in a Wikipedia article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/47_(number)
__________________
Star Trek Journal
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-07-2008, 08:32 AM
Trekkie's Avatar
Trekkie Trekkie is offline
Ensign
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 91
Default

Hey thanks for the links about 47.

So all of the multiples of 3 or 9 are just noticeable to me, but aren't there for any particular reason or purpose?

Oh well- just curious.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:53 AM.


Forum theme courtesy of Mark Lambert
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 by Paramount Pictures. STAR TREK and all related
marks and logos are trademarks of CBS Studios Inc. All Rights Reserved.