The Official Star Trek Movie Forum

The Official Star Trek Movie Forum > Star Trek > Star Trek XI: The Movie > Fan Reactions!
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-12-2008, 04:06 PM
tomcatjosh's Avatar
tomcatjosh tomcatjosh is offline
Vice Admiral
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,803
Post Fan Reactions!

Big Reaction To New Enterprise - New Designer Responds November 12, 2008

by TrekMovie.com Staff , Filed under: Fandom, Star Trek (2009 film) , trackback
The new USS Enterprise released yesterday has spawned dozens if not hundreds of articles across the globe in the mainstream press and the geekosphere. Reaction here at TrekMovie has been running at one comment every 49 seconds for 24 hours straight. In that deluge are a few notables, including former Star Trek designer Rick Sternbach and the designer of the new ship, Ryan Church.


Sternbach and Church on the new E
Rick Sternbach was a senior illustrator and designer for the Trek franchise going all the way back to star Trek The Motion Picture, working mostly on the TV series in the TNG era (Next Gen, DS9 and Voyager). He designed dozens of Trek ships and stations, including Deep Space Nine, the Klingon Vor’cha battle cruise, the USS Voyager, and the USS Enterprise C.
I get the distinct impression that to do the nacelles and secondary hull, someone stared at the USS Pasteur for a while. Just a thought. But even the Pasteur’s Bussard collectors had line of sight to open space, which the nacelles on this new ship don’t seem to have. Perhaps the designers didn’t know exactly how the different hardware bits worked (I violated this rule a little here and there, but I knew when I was doing it). Now I’m not being a whiner, just an informed critic. There’s room in this Trek world for healthy design criticism, as well as simply sitting back and enjoying a well made SF film. I -hope- the film is well written and clever and has good proportions of action, humor, tech, etc. but I’m also prepared to analyze the design work to see, perhaps, how far the shapes and colors and functions stray from 40 years of evolved gear.
This and the many other comments got the notice of the designer of the new Enterprise, Ryan Church, who has worked on the Star Wars prequels, the Transformers movies and the new James Cameron film Avatar. Church wrote in the TrekMovie comments:
I’m not going to get involved in the mud slinging, here, but needed to assure you guys and gals: we’ve built you a fine ship. To clarify: there’s a slight optical illusion occurring here, consequence of the “camera” angle. For Rick and others who worry the nacelles don’t have a clear line of sight over the disc — they, in fact, do. We were hardly working in a vacuum. I raided ILM reference photos like a madman. We were deferential to “inviolates” of Star Trek design vocabulary. Additionally, the profile here isn’t 100% representative, because, as you’ve noticed, the Bussards are dimmed. The true profile of the nacelles may or may not be revealed here, and that’s all I’ll say.
Sternbach replied back, noting that he has since had a chance to see a new angle of the Enterprise (lucky Rick!)
I went back and checked the Bussard clearance, and yeah, it works. I’ve seen a port side ortho[graphic] elevation, and I don’t have a problem with the mechanics of it, it’s the proportions and flows of the basic parts that look odd to me. Granted, no ship ever looks perfect in every ortho view, nor in every perspective view. We who have done this stuff in our sleep know that most vehicle and prop designs have their “best” faces. I’m not going to bore people with excerpts from my classical art and architecture books, though I will probably thumb through them here just to see if I can glean anything relevant. Like I said, I’ll wait to see how the film looks as a whole effort.
Which all just goes to show you that even the pros can take different views and even modify their views, especially when given more information. So far we have only two views of the new Enterprise and we have yet to see it in motion, that is worth considering.
Fan comparisons and mods
One of the great things about TrekMovie.com is our community of Trekkies and their creativity. Here are some comparison and modification images from our members (click to enlarge).
__________________


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-12-2008, 04:14 PM
Livingston's Avatar
Livingston Livingston is offline
Admiral
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Along the Kessel Run
Posts: 4,964
Default

Great find there, Tomcat! Interesting about the lens distortion, perhaps we are not seeing the ship properly proportioned.
__________________


"Death, delicious strawberry flavored death!"

Last edited by Livingston : 11-12-2008 at 04:19 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-12-2008, 04:23 PM
tetanus4breakfast's Avatar
tetanus4breakfast tetanus4breakfast is offline
Ensign
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 96
Default

Thanks for that. A bit of designer envy going on there I think. Come to think of it, considering the fact that it was designed by Church, the Nacelles are kind of reminiscant of the Naboo starfighter from episode 1.
__________________
Brutal.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-12-2008, 04:35 PM
Star Trek's Avatar
Star Trek Star Trek is offline
Lieutenant Commander
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South FL.
Posts: 709
Default

Cool stuff - thanks for the link - I even added my 2 quatloos...
__________________
I'm ba-aack...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-12-2008, 04:43 PM
number 3's Avatar
number 3 number 3 is offline
Ensign
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 79
Default

Good jod Tomcat...thanks
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-12-2008, 04:43 PM
number 3's Avatar
number 3 number 3 is offline
Ensign
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 79
Default

Job....shat...is this keyboard working???LOL
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-12-2008, 04:45 PM
tomcatjosh's Avatar
tomcatjosh tomcatjosh is offline
Vice Admiral
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,803
Default

??????
__________________


Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-12-2008, 04:52 PM
jesustrek's Avatar
jesustrek jesustrek is offline
Ensign
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 29
Default

Heheheeeee yesssssssssss¡¡¡¡
http://http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8B1GNCSfX0
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-12-2008, 05:06 PM
tomcatjosh's Avatar
tomcatjosh tomcatjosh is offline
Vice Admiral
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,803
Default

My Gosh...
__________________


Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-12-2008, 10:16 PM
kevin's Avatar
kevin kevin is offline
Federation Councillor
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: East Kilbride, Glasgow, UK
Posts: 21,077
Default

Interesting read, especially Sternbach.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:10 PM.


Forum theme courtesy of Mark Lambert
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 by Paramount Pictures. STAR TREK and all related
marks and logos are trademarks of CBS Studios Inc. All Rights Reserved.