|
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
11-12-2008, 10:17 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
"One of the many, the proud, the friends of Zardoz". 
|
|
#12
11-12-2008, 10:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
blah de blah de dah...
So where's the gay anti - hero or captain jack stand in? Are we going to have a sanitised production pandering to mid west christians (aka...the delusionals)? Why hasn't set design been given to the French, script to the British and lighting to the Germans? Kirk smirk... Jon Luc was a better captain....
|
|
#13
11-12-2008, 10:31 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
"One of the many, the proud, the friends of Zardoz".
|
|
#14
11-13-2008, 04:01 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The whole truth of the matter can be surmised to observing the franchise's history books--from Star Trek: Generations to present. It shows that if Star Trek sticks to the status quo going forward (the status quo being the format from projects past), public impressions of Star Trek will never change and the franchise will continue to dwindle as will public interest. It's one thing to be a true Trekkie, but it's another thing to be a loyal fan who wants Star Trek to thrive--even if it means that a few things have to change in order for it to do so. To sum it up, what would be such a good thing about sticking to the old fans' format? Where would there be any benefit in watching something you love die--just it can be kep the same for the purpose of satisfying selfish druthers? I think it would be akin to the old adage of "beating a dead horse". I also think that adage can be applied to this whole arguement.
__________________
"Why is any object we don't understand always called 'a thing' ?" ~ Dr. Leonard H. McCoy, Star Trek: The Motion Picture Last edited by SouthernSpockette : 11-13-2008 at 08:06 AM.
|
|
#15
11-13-2008, 08:51 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Who gives life to whom? I want that STAR TREK because UNIC,  a person that says to be an admirer of SW and that sure nothing imports him what is Star Trek.
|
|
#16
11-13-2008, 10:23 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Exactly a point I've made many times... Enterprise started getting truly good when it was taken in the direction of actually being the prequel fans were led to expect. It died because that promise wasn't delivered on until it was already too late to save it.
__________________
"Now I did a job -- and got nothin' but trouble since I did it, not to mention more than a few unkind words as regard to my character, so let me make this abundantly clear: I do the job... and then I get paid. Go run your little world."
|
|
#17
11-13-2008, 10:53 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#18
11-13-2008, 10:55 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#19
11-13-2008, 11:09 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Shatner isn't going to win new fans. I liked him don't get me wrong. He had a unique take to acting to put it lightly, however I don't think he's going to win any bonus points fot his movie. Most younger people I talk to cannot stand Shatner if not because of his whiny youtube videoes but for his ridiculous acting style. While this is not my own opinion of him, i can't help but think that he would have a slightly worse effect for the movie.
And seriously, he's not in it. RELAX go complain about the sets more.
__________________
 "It's worked so far but we're not out yet."- Leonard "Bones" McCoy
|
|
#20
11-13-2008, 11:10 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:58 AM.