[omegaman]

Clearer details of the Kelvin.

[horatio]

Which details are you talking about, if I may ask?

[omegaman]

Clearer details of the shadowed areas of the hull.

[HRH The KING]

It's a nice looking ship.

[Diron Hod]

I see no real difference, but it's still a nice looking pic.

[aef6259]

I'm still confused about the Kelvin. Are we looking at the top or bottom of the ship? Is that a warp nacelle or a secondary/engineering hull?

[mjcrawford]

Originally Posted by aef6259

I'm still confused about the Kelvin. Are we looking at the top or bottom of the ship? Is that a warp nacelle or a secondary/engineering hull?

I think that the Kelvin is a lot like the old scout ship from the original ‘Star Trek Technical Manual’ a single warp nacelle under the primary hull but with the added engineering section above the primary hull much like the mini-hull on the Reliant.

[aef6259]

Originally Posted by mjcrawford

I think that the Kelvin is a lot like the old scout ship from the original ‘Star Trek Technical Manual’ a single warp nacelle under the primary hull but with the added engineering section above the primary hull much like the mini-hull on the Reliant.

The scout ship Idea makes sence - I assume you are refering the Hermes Class.
I'm still curious if we are looking at a nacelle or an engineering hull.

I hope this is a nacelle and a 2 nacelle ship. I was never a big fan of the Idea of single nacelle concept.

See the "Roddenberry's Design Rules" about 1/3 of the way down this page:
http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/articles/design.htm

[Aqua]

we're looking at the top, the lettering just doesn't work if your flip or rotate it any other way, and it appears to have the engineering hull on top

[Livingston]

Wonder what the yellow glow to frame left is. Maybe it's near a star.