The Official Star Trek Movie Forum

The Official Star Trek Movie Forum > Star Trek > Star Trek XI: The Movie > If it had been you...
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 02-03-2008, 05:25 AM
VADBAXTER's Avatar
VADBAXTER VADBAXTER is offline
Lieutenant, Junior Grade
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hesperia, CA
Posts: 163
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raytas View Post
No, the "moving forward" thing is about exploring the human condition, not moving forward on the calendar. You can tell the most amazing stories with the original crew, and at least everybody knows them. They'll draw people to the cinemas. I love DS9 and the Dominion War, but nobody but DS9 fans would actually get stories set during that time, and with those characters. Wouldn't be too profitable, I suppose.

A "reboot", "prequel" (whatever you want to call it) is the way to go. Something new, fresh, modern and exciting.... something that won't be weighed down by all established Trek canon (which would undoubtedly happen if we went to the 25th century. There is no way you could tell a story that would appeal to Joe Sixpack and Trekkies at the same time if you had to take into consideration every little established fact of Trek).

I trust JJ. He knows what he's doing.
*SPOILER WARNING*

As has been posted in another topic is that TREK XI does in fact start in the TNG era and goes back to a 23rd century alternate universe related to the one we see in "Yesterday's Enterprise".
__________________
Star Fleets finest Boldly Going Where No One Has Gone Before


Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-03-2008, 05:29 AM
Raiden's Avatar
Raiden Raiden is offline
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London, England
Posts: 346
Default

Has to be a sequel to revive interest but i would have made sure Kirk came back from the dead or something like that.
__________________
Are You Lookin' at Me?
First Raid'en'tan under the Vorta Eris
Victory is Life !


HardyCofE
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-03-2008, 06:33 AM
Parmas's Avatar
Parmas Parmas is offline
Midshipman
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 7
Default

The idea of a prequel has merits, as well as moving on to
the 25th century. The latter would require some mind-numbing
special effects, while the former would be more in reach with
our present technology.
The vision of this director may create an experience that may
leave us eager for more. I enjoyed "Alias", which has only
appeared in Japan for rental up to season three, but it has been an exciting ride!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-03-2008, 06:43 AM
Raytas's Avatar
Raytas Raytas is offline
Midshipman
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The Petrelli Mansion
Posts: 7
Default

So? That does not mean they're moving ahead in the timeline to tell a 25th-century story. It's only sort of a plot device and does not require any previously established TNG-era canon. The main story will be set in the 23rd century, establishing *new* canon, if you will. My point stands- it is a new start.

Don't you think?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-03-2008, 09:25 AM
Aaleck's Avatar
Aaleck Aaleck is offline
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 277
Default

I'd probably do the same, but i'd have a lot more people angry with me about the canon... lol
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-03-2008, 09:55 AM
HRH The KING's Avatar
HRH The KING HRH The KING is offline
Lieutenant Commander
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Royal Estates
Posts: 733
Default

I would leave motion pictures aside entirely and focus on DVD and TV.

There are many options for the franchise to take.

The first thing I would do is produce a TOS Movie Era CGI animated show.

Keep that going for as long as possible to bring some stability to Star Trek on TV.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-03-2008, 01:57 PM
Tygrrius's Avatar
Tygrrius Tygrrius is offline
Ensign
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 27
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chekov1701 View Post
My 1st idea. If it was me who was given this $150,000,000 Trek film to make, I would have proberly tried to avoid a prequel. I would have explored the 25th Century and bring in new characters and a new ship. Gene Roddenberry always moved foward and I wouldn't change the tradition.

2nd idea. With a budget like that, battle sequences could be huge and spectacular. A movie that would focus on the Dominion War in depth, really show the battles in full and from the perspective of others than the DS9 crew.
Wouldn't "moving forward" preclude "going back" to rehash the Dominion War?
__________________
Tygrrius, www.thefilmfrontier.com
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-03-2008, 02:51 PM
ctiii ctiii is offline
Ensign
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 53
Default

I would have gone with a completely different ship/crew/etc....no sense retreading on what was done right the first time. I wouldnt mind seeing a movie from the point of view of one of the Alien races we've seen over the years, though I see nothing wrong with having a primarily human crew either...something set post NEM. There are sci-fi movies put out all the time that dont have previously established stories/characters and they do just fine in the theaters...so why wouldnt that work here?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:27 AM.


Forum theme courtesy of Mark Lambert
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 by Paramount Pictures. STAR TREK and all related
marks and logos are trademarks of CBS Studios Inc. All Rights Reserved.