The Official Star Trek Movie Forum

The Official Star Trek Movie Forum > Star Trek > General Star Trek Discussions > TV Shows > Enterprise > enterprise should come back
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

View Poll Results: who thinks enterprise should come back
yes 66 66.67%
no 20 20.20%
maybe 6 6.06%
they should make a film about it 18 18.18%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 99. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-21-2008, 11:29 AM
captian beckett captian beckett is offline
Lieutenant Commander
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 797
Default enterprise should come back

i think enterprise sould come back for a nother few seasons

it was the best star trek to me you may think other wise

at least they sould make a film about it
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-21-2008, 11:39 AM
Zardoz's Avatar
Zardoz Zardoz is offline
Federation Councillor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Somewhere In The Future
Posts: 31,432
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by captian beckett View Post
i think enterprise sould come back for a nother few seasons

it was the best star trek to me you may think other wise

at least they sould make a film about it
Well the Sci Fi Channel was getting alot of requests for them to finish off ENT's final 3 seasons when they started airing them, haven't heard much since then though.
__________________
"High Priestesses Of Zardoz" By Eliza's Starbase Of Avatars Copyright 2009."
"Zardoz Speaks To You, His Choosen Trek Fans."
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-21-2008, 12:27 PM
radoskal's Avatar
radoskal radoskal is offline
Commander
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 952
Default

Enterprise was canceled for a reason let it stay canceled. If it was worth 7 seasons it would have stayed on 7 seasons.
__________________
Mom, how many times do I have to tell you, Track is what athletes run on. Trek is what the Enterprise goes on.

-Free Enterprise
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-21-2008, 12:37 PM
MrQ1701's Avatar
MrQ1701 MrQ1701 is offline
Vice Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Espanola, New Mexico
Posts: 3,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by radoskal View Post
Enterprise was canceled for a reason let it stay canceled. If it was worth 7 seasons it would have stayed on 7 seasons.
No. UPN killed Enterprise. It was a good show. We can all agree to disagree over the finer points of the show, but not here. It was a different take on early trek and that ticked off alot of people (including radoskal apparently), but it was enjoyed by many, many trek fans. It also did a good job of bringing in non-trekkers that were able to enjoy the show without any prior knowledge about Trek.

I wish there was something Sci-Fi could work out with CBS/Paramount in order to bring it back in some fashion. That would ROCK!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-21-2008, 12:45 PM
BillzHere's Avatar
BillzHere BillzHere is offline
Midshipman
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 4
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by captian beckett View Post
i think enterprise sould come back for a nother few seasons

it was the best star trek to me you may think other wise

at least they sould make a film about it
I agree that Enterprise should come back; perhaps to bring it more in-line with the original story. I never could quite reconcile TOS and ENT.

The cast was ok. Loved the Beagle! I just don't recall an NX-01 or a Capt. Archer prior to ENT.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-21-2008, 01:00 PM
MrQ1701's Avatar
MrQ1701 MrQ1701 is offline
Vice Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Espanola, New Mexico
Posts: 3,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BillzHere View Post
I never could quite reconcile TOS and ENT.

The cast was ok. Loved the Beagle! I just don't recall an NX-01 or a Capt. Archer prior to ENT.
Alot of people feel that way. Canonites cry about it all the time. I always thought of it like this: TOS, TNG, etc... never discussed much other than "UFP history". I think that leaves room to write in an Enterprise that was never mentioned. It would have been GREAT if Archer and the NX-01 had been mentioned before in another series, but just because it wasn't doesn't mean we should all think "they screwwed up 'history'"
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-21-2008, 01:00 PM
Oregon_Coast_Trekkie's Avatar
Oregon_Coast_Trekkie Oregon_Coast_Trekkie is offline
Commander
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,271
Default

Enterprise was cancelled way too soon. It should have gone 7 years. It really had the makings of becoming the best of the Trek series'.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-21-2008, 01:05 PM
MrQ1701's Avatar
MrQ1701 MrQ1701 is offline
Vice Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Espanola, New Mexico
Posts: 3,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oregon_Coast_Trekkie View Post
Enterprise was cancelled way too soon. It should have gone 7 years. It really had the makings of becoming the best of the Trek series'.
I agree.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-21-2008, 01:07 PM
BillzHere's Avatar
BillzHere BillzHere is offline
Midshipman
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrQ1701 View Post
Alot of people feel that way. Canonites cry about it all the time. I always thought of it like this: TOS, TNG, etc... never discussed much other than "UFP history". I think that leaves room to write in an Enterprise that was never mentioned. It would have been GREAT if Archer and the NX-01 had been mentioned before in another series, but just because it wasn't doesn't mean we should all think "they screwwed up 'history'"
I don't believe 'they screwed up history', however when ENT was introduced to the Star Trek fan base there could have been some kind of lead-in... "As the show starts, Christopher Pike is recalling his briefing from the first captain of the first warp 5 ship with the name Enterprise, model NX-01. 'Captain Archer view points made me aware of the difficulties I would encounter, but never could foresee being stuck in this mechanical contraption! (his 'life support system', not the Enterprise)'"
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-21-2008, 01:09 PM
radoskal's Avatar
radoskal radoskal is offline
Commander
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 952
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BillzHere View Post
I don't believe 'they screwed up history', however when ENT was introduced to the Star Trek fan base there could have been some kind of lead-in... "As the show starts, Christopher Pike is recalling his briefing from the first captain of the first warp 5 ship with the name Enterprise, model NX-01. 'Captain Archer view points made me aware of the difficulties I would encounter, but never could foresee being stuck in this mechanical contraption! (his 'life support system', not the Enterprise)'"
Just something as small as that would have made a whole lot of difference.
__________________
Mom, how many times do I have to tell you, Track is what athletes run on. Trek is what the Enterprise goes on.

-Free Enterprise
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:42 AM.


Forum theme courtesy of Mark Lambert
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 by Paramount Pictures. STAR TREK and all related
marks and logos are trademarks of CBS Studios Inc. All Rights Reserved.