The Official Star Trek Movie Forum

The Official Star Trek Movie Forum > Star Trek > General Star Trek Discussions > Is it Khan?
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-25-2012, 03:50 PM
MigueldaRican's Avatar
MigueldaRican MigueldaRican is offline
Lieutenant Commander
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 765
Default Is it Khan?

Am I not a real nerd because I choose not to come to conclusions before actually seeing a film?

It happens every time. And about half the time, many people's preconceptions (good or bad) turn out completely wrong.

Everywhere I read, Khan is not confirmed, only speculated as the villain in the next film. Yet I keep seeing fans acting like it is confirmed. I see comments made basically in assumption that it is confirmed, and simply expressing either their disappointment and rage over such a travesty, or expressing joy and excitement.

So is it confirmed, or do we need to do like we should have done last year. Remember? "This movie's gonna suck! They turned the Enterprise into an iMac! AAAah... oh wait, the movie is actually good."
__________________
01001110011011110010000001101101011011110111001001 10010100100000011000100110110001100001011010000010 00000110001001101100011000010110100000100000011000 10011011000110000101101000
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-26-2012, 01:04 AM
samwiseb samwiseb is offline
Commander
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,207
Default

It's not confirmed. Trailers begin circulating in two-plus weeks.

If 'it's' not Khan at this point, it could be one of the cleverest deceptions in Hollywood rumor control history. And if anyone is 'worthy' of being able to employ such misdirection towards eager fans -and by willing participation of those said very same fans, no less- it just might happen to be the Abrams team.

On the other hand... if 'it' is Khan, then JJ and company have to know that their movie absolutely needs to hit a home run and be the ST that finally surpasses The Wrath of Khan. Yes, have to, and yes, needs. Because comparisons between the two films would be inevitable.

This by no means guarantees the film would succeed in topping Khan; if anything the odds are 'probably' against. But they would have to know that whatever criticism, abuse or negative buzz they receive, they'll have walked right into it. They have to.

So if 'it' is Khan, take 'some' comfort in the fact that they're fully confident in betting their cards on what they've got. For however much or little you think their confidence is worth in your estimation.

And besides, the whole "It's gonna suck" song and dance has been a seemingly obligatory Trek tradition ever since fans heard negative buzz about the death of Spock and dared Wrath of Khan to 'suck' as much as they believed The Motion Picture did. There's no detour around it. The only way out is through.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-26-2012, 03:37 AM
horatio's Avatar
horatio horatio is offline
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 9,282
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MigueldaRican View Post
Everywhere I read, Khan is not confirmed, only speculated as the villain in the next film. Yet I keep seeing fans acting like it is confirmed. I see comments made basically in assumption that it is confirmed, and simply expressing either their disappointment and rage over such a travesty, or expressing joy and excitement.
I don't remember the precise words but there was something about an iconic character from TOS or something like that. So the talk isn't merely wishful (or doomsday) thinking of some stupid fanboys but actually a fairly rational prediction. Khan is clearly more likely to be the villain than Gary Mitchell or whoever.
And no, just because people have issues with the half-a*sed nature of this reboot which is reflected in the reuse TOS characters doesn't mean that they are whiners or that the movie will actually be bad. There are plenty of interesting and not-so-iconic (this is why STXI sometimes felt like Galaxy Quest, it tried a bit to emulate what the public thinks TOS has been) species you could reuse.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-26-2012, 04:00 AM
kevin's Avatar
kevin kevin is offline
Federation Councillor
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: East Kilbride, Glasgow, UK
Posts: 21,077
Default

My only thought would echo Sam, if it is Khan then they have to have great belief in what they have chosen to do because it is essentially walking right into a trap just by using him.

It would be basically setting themselves up for an immense fall if they fail to deliver. Like intentionally kicking a Hornet's Nest. As noted there is utterly no 'out' for them if they use him and don't deliver. None of which means the film itself can't and won't be good but it would be a whole other layer of expectation I don't think they need given they've already managed to polarise some people last time around.

If it's not him..............well, I'm at the point where I wouldn't be surprised if it went either way.
__________________
'If the Apocalypse starts, beep me!' - Buffy Summers
'The sky's the limit.....' Jean-Luc Picard, 'All Good Things'


courtesy of Saquist

Last edited by kevin : 11-26-2012 at 05:45 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-26-2012, 08:17 PM
samwiseb samwiseb is offline
Commander
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,207
Default

http://www.aintitcool.com/node/59779

Or alternatively...

http://trekmovie.com/2012/11/26/brea...ness-revealed/
__________________


Last edited by samwiseb : 11-26-2012 at 08:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-26-2012, 09:50 PM
kevin's Avatar
kevin kevin is offline
Federation Councillor
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: East Kilbride, Glasgow, UK
Posts: 21,077
Default

Hmmmmmnnnnnnnnn....................that doesn't really sound Khan friendly...................hmmmmmmmmnnnnn.

I'm curious about what some of the wording in the synopsis actually means, and I can but already somewhat hear the echoes of Nolan from just over the hillside, but I'm in a position where I can't make up my mind if this makes me go 'intriguing' or 'u-huh?' but I'm gonna have to see that trailer.

Either way, I don't think we'll have to wait much longer to find out just who Cumberbatch is for definite.
__________________
'If the Apocalypse starts, beep me!' - Buffy Summers
'The sky's the limit.....' Jean-Luc Picard, 'All Good Things'


courtesy of Saquist

Last edited by kevin : 11-26-2012 at 10:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-27-2012, 04:42 AM
starbase63's Avatar
starbase63 starbase63 is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Connecticut, USA
Posts: 1,727
Cool

I'm tellin' you guys, if it's not Gary Mitchell, it's someone mentioned in early TOS like Orci said, possibly someone like the name "Ferris" dropped by Kirk...
__________________
Never keep a Vulcan waiting...
Admin, sb63's Star Trek Logs, member of the Trek Webmaster Program
STL is now also on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/StarTrekLogs
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-27-2012, 07:18 AM
jla1987's Avatar
jla1987 jla1987 is offline
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,483
Default

Gary Mitchell seems like the choice at this point, but one never knows for sure with Abrams Mystery Machine...
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-27-2012, 09:05 AM
DNA-1842's Avatar
DNA-1842 DNA-1842 is offline
Vice Admiral
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland, Europe, Terra - ZZ9 PluralZAlpha
Posts: 3,594
Default

Gary Mitchell has already been disproven in theory. By the Orci approved comics.
__________________
Gronda Gronda to all Zarking Hoopy Froods! Bowties are cool.
I Am A Friend Of


(And an indirectly founding patron of the Elizadolots Avatar Thingy.)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-27-2012, 11:45 AM
starwarsrcks's Avatar
starwarsrcks starwarsrcks is offline
Vice Admiral
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 3,062
Default

We should wait until the first trailer comes but I doubt that will give away who Cumberbatch is playing, this secrecy is weird.
__________________



Space is disease and dangerous wrapped in darkness and silence-Leonard Bones McCoy
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:48 PM.


Forum theme courtesy of Mark Lambert
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 by Paramount Pictures. STAR TREK and all related
marks and logos are trademarks of CBS Studios Inc. All Rights Reserved.