[NCC-73515]

Originally Posted by Saquist

The American Shuttles have always had auto pilot.

As Buran was designed to be capable of both manned and robotic flight, it had automated landing capability; the manned version was never operational. The Space Shuttle was later retrofitted with an automated landing capability; the equipment to make this possible was first flown on STS-121, but is intended only as a contingency, and has never been used on any flight.

-wiki

And the boosters could be turned off and didn't have the ring problems that destroyed the Challenger.

I've been told that the design was not stolen and that this is always the result of calculations when someone wants to find the optimal shape for a reusable spacecraft.

[martok2112]

Vhut?!

No "Ze space shuttle vus a Russian inwention" jokes?

[Saquist]

Originally Posted by NCC-73515

-wiki

And the boosters could be turned off and didn't have the ring problems that destroyed the Challenger.

I've been told that the design was not stolen and that this is always the result of calculations when someone wants to find the optimal shape for a reusable spacecraft.

Hmmm.

Perhaps you should read this article.
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sourc...X5JIMF0Qa3ba9Q

[starbase63]

Originally Posted by Ensign James T. Kirk

You mean because of the jet engines in the tail? That just reduces payload capacity, and of course the Soviets never really meant to use Buran for workhorse duty, it seems.

Buran was a "Nyah, nyah, us too" project stolen from the US.

The one with the jet engines was never intended for spaceflight capability.