The Official Star Trek Movie Forum

The Official Star Trek Movie Forum > Star Trek > Off Topic Discussions > Shuttle Atlantis
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 06-16-2010, 12:19 PM
NCC-73515's Avatar
NCC-73515 NCC-73515 is offline
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
Posts: 7,225
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saquist View Post
The American Shuttles have always had auto pilot.
Quote:
As Buran was designed to be capable of both manned and robotic flight, it had automated landing capability; the manned version was never operational. The Space Shuttle was later retrofitted with an automated landing capability; the equipment to make this possible was first flown on STS-121, but is intended only as a contingency, and has never been used on any flight.
-wiki

And the boosters could be turned off and didn't have the ring problems that destroyed the Challenger.

I've been told that the design was not stolen and that this is always the result of calculations when someone wants to find the optimal shape for a reusable spacecraft.
__________________


"English! I thought I dreamed hearing it!"?
Khan, Space Seed (TOS)

Brought to you in living color by NCC.
-= first fan member =-

Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 06-16-2010, 02:58 PM
martok2112's Avatar
martok2112 martok2112 is offline
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: River Ridge, LA
Posts: 6,480
Default

Vhut?!

No "Ze space shuttle vus a Russian inwention" jokes?

__________________

Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 06-17-2010, 03:27 AM
Saquist's Avatar
Saquist Saquist is offline
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,257
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NCC-73515 View Post
-wiki

And the boosters could be turned off and didn't have the ring problems that destroyed the Challenger.

I've been told that the design was not stolen and that this is always the result of calculations when someone wants to find the optimal shape for a reusable spacecraft.
Hmmm.

Perhaps you should read this article.
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sourc...X5JIMF0Qa3ba9Q
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 06-17-2010, 05:24 AM
starbase63's Avatar
starbase63 starbase63 is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Connecticut, USA
Posts: 1,727
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ensign James T. Kirk View Post
You mean because of the jet engines in the tail? That just reduces payload capacity, and of course the Soviets never really meant to use Buran for workhorse duty, it seems.

Buran was a "Nyah, nyah, us too" project stolen from the US.
The one with the jet engines was never intended for spaceflight capability.
__________________
Never keep a Vulcan waiting...
Admin, sb63's Star Trek Logs, member of the Trek Webmaster Program
STL is now also on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/StarTrekLogs
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:19 PM.


Forum theme courtesy of Mark Lambert
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 by Paramount Pictures. STAR TREK and all related
marks and logos are trademarks of CBS Studios Inc. All Rights Reserved.