The Official Star Trek Movie Forum

The Official Star Trek Movie Forum > Star Trek > Star Trek XI: The Movie > The Good Trek Movie Guide: How to ensure your film doesn't suck part 1
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #111  
Old 09-08-2008, 10:17 AM
Elizadolots's Avatar
Elizadolots Elizadolots is offline
Admiral
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,466
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rabbitc View Post
There were millions of loyal viewers! And besides - the show was produced in syndication purposely so that it couldn't be cancelled.

I smelled a rat then and I still smell a rat. Want proof? Look what happened to Family Guy - and NO ONE can sit with a straight face and tell me that had bad ratings!

Star Trek wasn't killed by ratings or evil executives - it was killed by the United States Republican party. Think it's bad now - just wait and see what happens if McCain and Palin get elected - Palin will have ST banned for heracy!
As much fun as I think conspiracy theory is (and I do love them so!) there are a couple of fallacies here. First, Enterprise was not produced for syndication. It was produced to run exclusively on the UPN network. Indeed, I believe it was viewed as "magnet show" for the new network. The belief was that enough Star Trek fans would clamour for UPN on their cable systems that they'd end up in a lot of markets. That didn't happen. As noted, Enterprise's ratings went down dramatically after the first season and, in fact, the failure of Enterprise to capture a significant audience is a huge reason UPN failed.

Family Guy utterly tanked in the ratings when it first aired. That's why it got cancelled. However, it did really, really well in DVD sales. Much as the audience for Star Trek (TOS) grew dramatically when it went into syndication, the audience for Family Guy grew dramatically in DVD distribution. That got Fox to bring the show back and it's been thriving until this day. Here's an article from USA today at the time to suppport that.
__________________


Thanks to Ron Salon for the signature banner!
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old 09-08-2008, 10:36 AM
Zardoz's Avatar
Zardoz Zardoz is offline
Federation Councillor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Somewhere In The Future
Posts: 31,432
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elizadolots View Post
As much fun as I think conspiracy theory is (and I do love them so!) there are a couple of fallacies here. First, Enterprise was not produced for syndication. It was produced to run exclusively on the UPN network. Indeed, I believe it was viewed as "magnet show" for the new network. The belief was that enough Star Trek fans would clamour for UPN on their cable systems that they'd end up in a lot of markets. That didn't happen. As noted, Enterprise's ratings went down dramatically after the first season and, in fact, the failure of Enterprise to capture a significant audience is a huge reason UPN failed.

Family Guy utterly tanked in the ratings when it first aired. That's why it got cancelled. However, it did really, really well in DVD sales. Much as the audience for Star Trek (TOS) grew dramatically when it went into syndication, the audience for Family Guy grew dramatically in DVD distribution. That got Fox to bring the show back and it's been thriving until this day. Here's an article from USA today at the time to suppport that.
Wasn't VOY UPN's "magnet show?"
__________________
"High Priestesses Of Zardoz" By Eliza's Starbase Of Avatars Copyright 2009."
"Zardoz Speaks To You, His Choosen Trek Fans."
Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old 09-08-2008, 10:56 AM
Elizadolots's Avatar
Elizadolots Elizadolots is offline
Admiral
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,466
Default

Yes, and Voyager did reasonably well, however, UPN did not. Viacom bought CBS (the parent company) and retooled the network. After Voyager ended, Enterprise was brought onboard to be a "beacon" show....
__________________


Thanks to Ron Salon for the signature banner!
Reply With Quote
  #114  
Old 09-08-2008, 10:59 AM
Zardoz's Avatar
Zardoz Zardoz is offline
Federation Councillor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Somewhere In The Future
Posts: 31,432
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elizadolots View Post
Yes, and Voyager did reasonably well, however, UPN did not. Viacom bought CBS (the parent company) and retooled the network. After Voyager ended, Enterprise was brought onboard to be a "beacon" show....
Ok, gotcha!!
__________________
"High Priestesses Of Zardoz" By Eliza's Starbase Of Avatars Copyright 2009."
"Zardoz Speaks To You, His Choosen Trek Fans."
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:04 PM.


Forum theme courtesy of Mark Lambert
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 by Paramount Pictures. STAR TREK and all related
marks and logos are trademarks of CBS Studios Inc. All Rights Reserved.