The Official Star Trek Movie Forum

The Official Star Trek Movie Forum > Star Trek > Star Trek XI: The Movie > Your response to a (speculative) reboot
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

View Poll Results: How would you respond to a major timeline shift for Trek 11?
Forget the movie happened and strike it from Trek canon a la 'Threshold' from VOY 10 27.78%
Accept the change as Trek heads in a new direction 26 72.22%
Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-04-2008, 12:33 PM
Pxer's Avatar
Pxer Pxer is offline
Lieutenant, Junior Grade
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine
Posts: 196
Default Your response to a (speculative) reboot

Now I realize that we do not know the basic premise of the movie yet, but if major canonical violations are made or there is a major change in the timeline as we know it or the new movie brings about some sort of alternate reality be it through time travel or irreverance to canon, what will your thoughts be? Remember, I am talking in terms of some sort of major change in our Trek universe and I have faith this will not happen, but at this point we don't know...


I would have to wait and see as most of us would, but I'm just looking for initial reactions.

Last edited by Pxer : 02-04-2008 at 12:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-04-2008, 12:36 PM
HokieinSC's Avatar
HokieinSC HokieinSC is offline
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 354
Default

If the movie has a good story and stands on it's own merits while keeping the 'spirit' of Trek, it'll work for me.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-04-2008, 01:00 PM
Captain_of_the_Enterprise's Avatar
Captain_of_the_Enterprise Captain_of_the_Enterprise is offline
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: James Madison University
Posts: 272
Default

Do I think Abrams is going to change the Trek timeline as we know it? No, but can he have an interesting movie that involves time travel, alternative timelines, and a happy ending that we all will enjoy? Yes.
__________________



Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-04-2008, 01:44 PM
Datalore's Avatar
Datalore Datalore is offline
Lieutenant, Junior Grade
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 190
Default

I don t get the whole reboot idea wasnt that what Enterprise was suppost to do.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-04-2008, 01:48 PM
Raiden's Avatar
Raiden Raiden is offline
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London, England
Posts: 346
Default

It needs it, plus its not really a reboot, more a alternate universe
__________________
Are You Lookin' at Me?
First Raid'en'tan under the Vorta Eris
Victory is Life !


HardyCofE
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-04-2008, 01:54 PM
Pxer's Avatar
Pxer Pxer is offline
Lieutenant, Junior Grade
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine
Posts: 196
Default

Yeah, maybe the word Retcon will better apply to the film as we begin to learn more.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-04-2008, 02:46 PM
CaptainMackenzieCalhoun CaptainMackenzieCalhoun is offline
Midshipman
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Eastern Shore of Maryland
Posts: 2
Default

I hope the new movie won't create a timeline A (containing all of Trek until now and the beginning of Star Trek) and timeline B (created at the end of Star Trek). I don't mind alternate timelines as long as at the movie's end the original timeline is restored. There's so many gaps in the present timeline that holds a huge amount of opportunities of being explored that I don't see why a new timeline needs to be created.

Last edited by CaptainMackenzieCalhoun : 02-04-2008 at 02:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-04-2008, 03:29 PM
24thcenstfan's Avatar
24thcenstfan 24thcenstfan is offline
Ensign
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 97
Default

I think I will have to see the movie first before I can sufficiently describe how I will feel if it is a total reboot.

In general, I have no problem whatsoever with the direction Abrams is taking this movie. I am willing to give him, Orci and Kurtzman a chance to "do their thing".

I also look forward to seeing how this group of actors portrays the characters.

Characters from various genres are portrayed by different people in different ways all the time. As much as I sometimes dislike change, sometimes change isn't always bad. So, we will see how this all turns out...whatever they are calling it these days (i.e. reboot, re-imaging, quazi-something or another).
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-04-2008, 03:37 PM
Whitestar's Avatar
Whitestar Whitestar is offline
Ensign
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 90
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raiden View Post
It needs it, plus its not really a reboot, more a alternate universe
Actually, an alternate universe can be seen as a reboot!
__________________
Have you ever remembered what life was like before you were born? That's how it will be like after you're dead.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-04-2008, 04:00 PM
TyrantMikey's Avatar
TyrantMikey TyrantMikey is offline
Ensign
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Starfleet Command
Posts: 16
Default Not really sure

I'm of two minds about a reboot.
  • I'd love to see them maintain the existing continuity, and just fill in the gaps. It was a five year mission, and the original series was canceled after only three seasons. Then TMP showed up years after their mission was completed; Kirk had been promoted to Admiral, Spock was off on Vulcan, McCoy was retired (I think), and that whiney idiot Decker was going to be Captain of the Enterprise. There's tons of material yet to explore. The problem with trying to shoehorn new movies into existing historical canon is that you have to be very careful that you don't inadvertently contradict any of the canon that covers time that has gone on before (that is, the canon established by movies and series that cover the future time frame). You don't want to create a time paradox in the canon!
  • On the other hand, it'd be nice to see a re-imagining of the universe. A fresh perspective on the Trekverse from new eyes. From a purely selfish point of view, what would the universe look like if it was more industrialized, not so squeaky clean, if there was more danger, more intrigue, bigger battles, and so forth? What if the technology were more advanced, more aliens were actually present on the ship, and the interpersonal conflicts were more pronounced? What if the issues that were addressed were more relevant to our times? And what if the stories were freed from the baggage of forty+ years of historical canon so that they could go in any direction that the writers needed to take them in? Oh, the possibilities!
The danger, of course, is that if you change it too much, it's not Trek anymore. You'd have to be extremely careful to maintain the integrity of the characters and the ship itself.
So I don't know what I'd prefer. I'd like to know what happened during all those missing years. On the other hand, I'd like to give the writers all the freedom they need. I just don't know.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:38 PM.


Forum theme courtesy of Mark Lambert
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 by Paramount Pictures. STAR TREK and all related
marks and logos are trademarks of CBS Studios Inc. All Rights Reserved.