The Official Star Trek Movie Forum

The Official Star Trek Movie Forum > Star Trek > Off Topic Discussions > Lindelof teases Trek 3 villains and potential crossover with original timeline
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-05-2013, 04:42 PM
omegaman's Avatar
omegaman omegaman is offline
Admiral
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Penrith NSW Australia
Posts: 4,609
Default Lindelof teases Trek 3 villains and potential crossover with original timeline

http://www.blastr.com/2013-6-5/linde...ginal-timeline

There be Klingons on the starboard bow!…
__________________
TREK IS TREK. WHATEVER THE TIMELINE!

The next TV Series should be called STARFLEET!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-05-2013, 05:49 PM
omegaman's Avatar
omegaman omegaman is offline
Admiral
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Penrith NSW Australia
Posts: 4,609
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by horatio View Post
Just when I thought it couldn't get more fanwankish and my opinion of these idiots couldn't sink any further they come up with crossover, Borg, Q and Baby Picard.
Yeah… one wonders if we have to take this with a grain of salt… or not…
__________________
TREK IS TREK. WHATEVER THE TIMELINE!

The next TV Series should be called STARFLEET!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-06-2013, 04:18 AM
kevin's Avatar
kevin kevin is offline
Federation Councillor
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: East Kilbride, Glasgow, UK
Posts: 21,077
Default

I would take everything to do with a third film with a grain of salt right now, considering a third film hasn't been officially greenlit yet. Spitballing is spitballing. I'd put more credence in the Klingon side of things. That being said, the Borg got screwed up so thoroughly by the PTB's last time I doubt that would be a very good idea. They're probably left far far away. Just like they never fit into DS9, they wouldn't fit into TOS either.
__________________
'If the Apocalypse starts, beep me!' - Buffy Summers
'The sky's the limit.....' Jean-Luc Picard, 'All Good Things'


courtesy of Saquist
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-06-2013, 02:59 PM
Captain Tom Coughlin's Avatar
Captain Tom Coughlin Captain Tom Coughlin is offline
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USS Meadowlands
Posts: 10,990
Default

I take it with an ocean of salt
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-09-2013, 09:47 PM
Quark's Avatar
Quark Quark is offline
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Santa Monica, California
Posts: 2,653
Default

Knowing Lindelof, who said he would like to see Transformers combine with Star Trek, I doubt he would care about the original timeline.
__________________
*The word "dabo" means "I will give" in Latin, and "Gold" in Aramaic.

J.J. "Binks" Abrams is taking over sci-fi!
Fans Expendable
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-10-2013, 04:00 PM
horatio's Avatar
horatio horatio is offline
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 9,282
Default

I disagree.

Quote:
you can never see enough Klingons
Yes, you can. There were e.g. little fresh Klingon stuff in DS9 and VOY.
As I always say, these guys believe that you just need familiar ingredients to cook a good meal.

Quote:
You can’t talk about Trek and not talk about the Borg, and certainly about Q. Very iconic adversaries from The Next Generation which is, outside of the original cast films, was my entry way into Star Trek, so I wouldn’t mind getting – towards the end of our run on Star Trek, maybe baby Picard could be born. There has to be some sort of crossover we’re not thinking of.
I am a second generation Trek viewer as well and I frankly admit that I will never become much of a TOS fan (but then again even adamant TOS fans like Zim admit that the show had about 10 good episodes and the rest of them are roughly evenly split between average and bad) ... but I nonetheless advocate a retro 22nd century series and wouldn't even dream of mixing anything of TNG (except for its more accurate portrayal of Gene's vision and its superior Romulans) into a TOS movie.
The problem isn't that Lindelof cares too little about the original timeline, the problem is that he and Orci (I don't think any of the other guys involved has seen much Trek) care too much about it. And not in a good, creative 'being inspired by what came before you' but in a stupid, fanboyish 'gee, I wanna see that stuff again' way.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-11-2013, 09:07 AM
martok2112's Avatar
martok2112 martok2112 is offline
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: River Ridge, LA
Posts: 6,480
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by horatio View Post
The problem isn't that Lindelof cares too little about the original timeline, the problem is that he and Orci (I don't think any of the other guys involved has seen much Trek) care too much about it. And not in a good, creative 'being inspired by what came before you' but in a stupid, fanboyish 'gee, I wanna see that stuff again' way.
Which I will agree was a problem, I believe, with Nemesis (my favorite of the Next Gen films), with John Logan writing. He said in earlier interviews that he wanted to see the Enterprise do things it hadn't done before, but was apparently capable of doing...and such.

He, sadly, took a fanboy approach to the matter, (he is a self-proclaimed fan of Trek) and although it made for nice eye candy (I certainly enjoyed the hell out of the space battle which took up practically the entire second half of the film), it did not register well even with casual movie goers.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-11-2013, 11:58 AM
horatio's Avatar
horatio horatio is offline
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 9,282
Default

NEM had the great potential of being the first Trek movie about Romulans and I think it failed because it did not focus enough on the Romulans.
I also think that the villain with the monstership pattern which started there made the Romulans look far too weak.
And yes, I am perfectly of the irony: whining about missing the chance to do THE epic Romulan TNG movie is a fanboy critique.

So yeah, I don't wanna generalize and imply that fans suck at writing, e.g. during Piller's open door policy fans submitted great story drafts.
And of course it is unfair to merely focus on the plot and criticize STID as being too much of a copy job in this respect while totally ignoring that the texture and atmosphere of NuTrek is entirely new.

But I also think that two movies which heavily borrow from what came before are enough, now everything is set up and you could do your own thing (this was basically Kevin's thesis in another thread, view ST09 and STID as "setup" movies) yet Lindelof indicates that the next movie will not be different in terms of standing more on its own feet.
Let's not forget that the most popular was also the most radical Trek movie, there were quite some paradigm changes in TWOK (and while some like the stronger emphasis on Starfleet being a military was only used in the two Meyer movies the way spacebattles were handled remained virtually unchanged during the next twenty years).
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:47 PM.


Forum theme courtesy of Mark Lambert
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 by Paramount Pictures. STAR TREK and all related
marks and logos are trademarks of CBS Studios Inc. All Rights Reserved.