|
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
TREK IS TREK. WHATEVER THE TIMELINE!
The next TV Series should be called STARFLEET! |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just remember JJ's all smoke and mirrors when it comes to secrecy about his movies.
__________________
TREK IS TREK. WHATEVER THE TIMELINE!
The next TV Series should be called STARFLEET! |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Lets just hope its not an anachronistic holodeck malfunction ![]() ![]() Edit: Just remembered the lil' "Rascals" episode. LOL. Good episode though, but, I don't think it would work on big screen. Your right about smoke and mirrors, even a trailer could be deliberately misleading and send us all on a merry wild goose chase, but at least it would be something to go on.
__________________
You may find that having is not so pleasing a thing as wanting. This is not logical, but it is often true." Spock (Amok Time) Last edited by thestartrekker : 10-25-2012 at 02:16 AM. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Some interesting ideas, can't say I think anyone has hit the mark though, here's obviously what's really going to happen:
Cumberbatch is Gary Mitchel, Weller will be an officer around him and be a sidekick or right hand man sort of character. The story will revolve around Mitchell going a bit crazy and doing something which makes Starfleet send Kirk after him, being a close friend and all. This will give Kirk some good character interaction with Mitchell and for this time Spock will be the logical one reining Kirk in rather than the emotional Vulcan he was in the last film. Anyone think there's any chance any of that is right? And yeah... no more time travel! |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I actually hope your'e right on this score, and that Urban really did slip up, because, deep down I don't really want a Khan reboot, and I don't think other fans do either, but I just khan't shake that feeling...... I think Weller still might have some connection to his Enterprise character, but that's just me..
__________________
You may find that having is not so pleasing a thing as wanting. This is not logical, but it is often true." Spock (Amok Time) |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Have to disagree on the following: Spock's emotional side is here to stay. His character works better this way.
__________________
TREK IS TREK. WHATEVER THE TIMELINE!
The next TV Series should be called STARFLEET! |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I really disliked the Uhura thing though, a moment of weakness after the destruction of Vulcan I'd let slide, but not an all out relationship. (Professor Spock, and one of your students too , isn't that frowned upon.LOL)
__________________
You may find that having is not so pleasing a thing as wanting. This is not logical, but it is often true." Spock (Amok Time) |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
TREK IS TREK. WHATEVER THE TIMELINE!
The next TV Series should be called STARFLEET! |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Don't know, horses for courses I suppose. I actually thought of all the things with ST, that was the worst part of the film, and something the writers got wrong. Any romantic interest should have been for Kirk, and I'm not advocating Kirk/Uhura either, we don't need a TNG Riker/Troi thing going on.
__________________
You may find that having is not so pleasing a thing as wanting. This is not logical, but it is often true." Spock (Amok Time) Last edited by thestartrekker : 10-26-2012 at 10:19 AM. |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
TREK IS TREK. WHATEVER THE TIMELINE!
The next TV Series should be called STARFLEET! Last edited by omegaman : 10-26-2012 at 08:30 PM. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|