The Official Star Trek Movie Forum

The Official Star Trek Movie Forum > Star Trek > Off Topic Discussions > Is capitalism outdated in the 21st century?
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-25-2012, 01:28 PM
omegaman's Avatar
omegaman omegaman is offline
Admiral
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Penrith NSW Australia
Posts: 4,416
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Tom Coughlin View Post
The bailouts were a pretty good example. We take the risk of failing out of the equation because we are afraid of the consequences. The market said those banks should die, if this was pure Capitalisim they would have been allowed to die.
I tend to agree: If a company can't survive on its own it shouldn't be propped up by any means. The only problem is the number of employees that end up without a job and can't find another, and are forced onto welfare becoming a strain on the Federal Government.
__________________
TREK IS TREK. WHATEVER THE TIMELINE!

The next TV Series should be called STARFLEET!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-25-2012, 01:53 PM
horatio's Avatar
horatio horatio is offline
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 9,133
Default

That might be so in the case of an ordinary company but not so in the case of Lehman or any other giant bank going bankrupt.
I will never understand why people deny the existence of externalities. Must be all the propaganda produced by corporate-financed think tanks that makes people believe that Econ 101 is a leftist conspiracy.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-26-2012, 08:46 AM
kevin's Avatar
kevin kevin is offline
Federation Councillor
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: East Kilbride, Glasgow, UK
Posts: 20,909
Default

I'm no economist and I don't claim to be but I tend to agree with Horatio here.

If there's going to be a limited or manageable fallout from a private venture collapsing then that's fine. The problem was how large, intertwined and interconnected the big (BIG) banks and financial institutions became into the economies not just of their 'own' countries but the rest of the world. A Domino effect is then risked.

That's why billions (or is it trillions now? I lose track) was pumped into them. I can realise that and understand that.

But.............

I think it's deplorable that these guys took all the various countries public money they could eat up and STILL want to carry on their business as if nothing ever happened - eat the cake and then have it, so to speak (but then the guys at the top are so far removed from the 'reality' the bulk of us face of course they think they can go on as if nothing happened) - and so the effect is that despite agreeing with Horatio in principle I'm kinda finding myself getting more militantly indigant against these guys. I am guilty of feeling fed up and angry with them.

And I still have a job and can pretty much cover myself (for now, although my employer is like everyone else trying to find ways to screw you) so I'm not even as bad off as some others.

But I'm at the point now where I AM thinking a little bit like Tom and saying to myself 'I don't want my taxpayer's money to be used anymore to bail them out. These organisations don't deserve it'.

Let them collapse.
__________________
'If the Apocalypse starts, beep me!' - Buffy Summers
'The sky's the limit.....' Jean-Luc Picard, 'All Good Things'


courtesy of Saquist
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:53 AM.


Forum theme courtesy of Mark Lambert
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 by Paramount Pictures. STAR TREK and all related
marks and logos are trademarks of CBS Studios Inc. All Rights Reserved.