The Official Star Trek Movie Forum

The Official Star Trek Movie Forum > Star Trek > General Star Trek Discussions > TV Shows > The Next Generation > If the Enterprise-D were a real starship...
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-08-2010, 08:40 AM
Admiral Archer's Avatar
Admiral Archer Admiral Archer is offline
Lieutenant Commander
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Foothill Ranch, CA
Posts: 746
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saquist View Post
I don't get it...the Galaxy is 642. Why would the "real" ship be longer?
Simple...the fictional Galaxy is not 642 meters, either. The production team made a mistake when scaling the ship. I know, BLASPHEMY!!!

The truth is, the sets from TNG just wouldn't fit on a 642 meter starship. Take ten forward, for example. The ship would have to be much bigger to accommodate the interiors as seen on the show.

As a matter of fact, I remember hearing somewhere that Andrew Probert, the man who designed the Galaxy-class, said that he hated the ten forward set because it made the ship much bigger than he had intended when designing it (he said that the rim of the saucer was intended to be only one deck thick, while the official Rick Sternbach blueprints set the saucer rim at being two decks thick). Perhaps the 642 meter figure is based on Probert's original idea for the Galaxy-class size, but the ten forward set was what blew the ship out of proportion.
__________________
"To boldly go where no man has gone before"

--ADMIRAL JONATHAN ARCHER--

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-08-2010, 08:48 AM
kevin's Avatar
kevin kevin is offline
Federation Councillor
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: East Kilbride, Glasgow, UK
Posts: 21,078
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Admiral Archer View Post
Simple...the fictional Galaxy is not 642 meters, either. The production team made a mistake when scaling the ship. I know, BLASPHEMY!!!
Not blasphemy - just life!! The USS Defiant from DS9 is even more variable!!

Quote:
The truth is, the sets from TNG just wouldn't fit on a 642 meter starship. Take ten forward, for example. The ship would have to be much bigger to accommodate the interiors as seen on the show.

As a matter of fact, I remember hearing somewhere that Andrew Probert, the man who designed the Galaxy-class, said that he hated the ten forward set because it made the ship much bigger than he had intended when designing it (he said that the rim of the saucer was intended to be only one deck thick, while the official Rick Sternbach blueprints set the saucer rim at being two decks thick). Perhaps the 642 meter figure is based on Probert's original idea for the Galaxy-class size, but the ten forward set was what blew the ship out of proportion.
Interesting, I had not heard that before.
__________________
'If the Apocalypse starts, beep me!' - Buffy Summers
'The sky's the limit.....' Jean-Luc Picard, 'All Good Things'


courtesy of Saquist
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:01 PM.


Forum theme courtesy of Mark Lambert
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 by Paramount Pictures. STAR TREK and all related
marks and logos are trademarks of CBS Studios Inc. All Rights Reserved.