The Official Star Trek Movie Forum

The Official Star Trek Movie Forum > Star Trek > Off Topic Discussions > ISS Getting a new mission?
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-11-2010, 02:14 PM
Futureguy Futureguy is offline
Commander
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,153
Default ISS Getting a new mission?

Here is a link to a (proposed) re-purposed use of (at least part of) the ISS.......All that equipment already up there could actually be used for a non-LEO mission! I had always thought about the potential for using the station for such a purpose.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/space/201008...teroidnasasays

Too bad if it was not considered for the MIR! Just letting all that hardware burn up in the atmosphere after the energy and time to launch and build it. Even at its age, sections could have been adapted for non-crewed exploration...IMO
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-11-2010, 10:12 PM
Saquist's Avatar
Saquist Saquist is offline
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,257
Default

It sounds like a good idea but I don't like the idea of losing part of the station.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-12-2010, 06:26 PM
wade8069's Avatar
wade8069 wade8069 is offline
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 450
Default

Thanks for sharing.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-13-2010, 02:57 AM
martok2112's Avatar
martok2112 martok2112 is offline
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: River Ridge, LA
Posts: 6,480
Default

ISS ballistics test.

Station powers down, de-orbits, and crashes.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-15-2010, 03:26 AM
Saquist's Avatar
Saquist Saquist is offline
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,257
Default

I think it's sad that cost cutting measures have come this far.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-15-2010, 06:43 AM
kevin's Avatar
kevin kevin is offline
Federation Councillor
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: East Kilbride, Glasgow, UK
Posts: 21,077
Default

Once it's initial lifetime phase is over it's as well using the parts if possible for something else.

The Blank cheque days are over for a while, whether one likes it or not.
__________________
'If the Apocalypse starts, beep me!' - Buffy Summers
'The sky's the limit.....' Jean-Luc Picard, 'All Good Things'


courtesy of Saquist
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-15-2010, 08:31 AM
Futureguy Futureguy is offline
Commander
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin View Post
Once it's initial lifetime phase is over it's as well using the parts if possible for something else.

The Blank cheque days are over for a while, whether one likes it or not.
Just as well to do that as to merely de-orbit and summarily do away with some expensive hardware.
I say, at the end of its practical manned use, convert it into a grand, unmanned instrument platform with reserve habitation area, for supply and repair: With weather, geographical, solar data gathering instruments, or something of the sort.

Else it could be "parted out" and used as deep space modules for manned or unmanned explorations. Let that dude with the inflatable habitat modules re-use some of it as a test base. But don't finish it off with a planned burn-up at reentry!

Re-task it as a test habitat for a Mars visit. Outfit and supply it as if it were going to be used as a transport to Mars and "isolate" them from resupply, gradually making the time lag due to transmissions a "real" factor. Test the hardware and crew THERE instead of on the moon. I bet the $$$ would be much less and there would always be the "failsafe" of the crew being able to return to Earth in case of a catastrophic failure, which in itself would be an opportunity for a learning experience in LEO instead of half way to Mars. Look at what they may be learning from the current failure of one of the cooling loops on the station.

It's too bad that the Hubble could not be "anchored" to the station. Has it ever been discussed about whether the orbit inclinations are so different that a maneuver could not be made to join them up? (at a late date?)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:37 PM.


Forum theme courtesy of Mark Lambert
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 by Paramount Pictures. STAR TREK and all related
marks and logos are trademarks of CBS Studios Inc. All Rights Reserved.