The Official Star Trek Movie Forum

The Official Star Trek Movie Forum > Star Trek > Comments & Suggestions > This forum is so quiet why
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #121  
Old 07-11-2010, 01:27 AM
kevin's Avatar
kevin kevin is offline
Federation Councillor
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: East Kilbride, Glasgow, UK
Posts: 21,077
Default

Yep, I felt it was going off the boil anyway by the time he left but that was the final straw. I like Laurence Fishbourne (in movies) but he doesn't work on CSI, nor do I like that the producers have seemingly tried to morph the LV show into something that more resembles the Miami show.

Probably because by some mystifiable reason, it seems to be the most popular one presently. I never could get into the spin-off's much either and I outright detest every conceivable aspect of CSI: Miami, including the whole cast.
__________________
'If the Apocalypse starts, beep me!' - Buffy Summers
'The sky's the limit.....' Jean-Luc Picard, 'All Good Things'


courtesy of Saquist
Reply With Quote
  #122  
Old 07-11-2010, 07:56 AM
jla1987's Avatar
jla1987 jla1987 is offline
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,483
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin View Post
I never could get into the spin-off's much either and I outright detest every conceivable aspect of CSI: Miami, including the whole cast.
Same here!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #123  
Old 07-11-2010, 08:33 AM
Futureguy Futureguy is offline
Commander
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,153
Default

or ... "Big Brother - 24th Century" (The reality show, not from the book 1984)
or "Survivor - Ceti Alpha 4": Khan's Tribe
or "Late Night - with Commander Data"

I personally got a good laugh with the thoughts of "Late Night - with Commander Data".

STXII could be a "Survivor" spin-off!
Reply With Quote
  #124  
Old 07-12-2010, 08:13 AM
starbase63's Avatar
starbase63 starbase63 is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Connecticut, USA
Posts: 1,727
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin View Post
So, is this a sign that CBS is planning to actually get off their asses and do something useful with Star Trek again in the TV vein, or do they simply want a piece of the online action again after letting the original site slide themselves when it suited them to do so?
Simply it seems CBS realized they had let slip a way to make money...that's why CBS Consumer Products will be running the revamped site.
__________________
Never keep a Vulcan waiting...
Admin, sb63's Star Trek Logs, member of the Trek Webmaster Program
STL is now also on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/StarTrekLogs
Reply With Quote
  #125  
Old 07-12-2010, 08:43 AM
kevin's Avatar
kevin kevin is offline
Federation Councillor
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: East Kilbride, Glasgow, UK
Posts: 21,077
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by starbase63 View Post
Simply it seems CBS realized they had let slip a way to make money...that's why CBS Consumer Products will be running the revamped site.
Figured.
__________________
'If the Apocalypse starts, beep me!' - Buffy Summers
'The sky's the limit.....' Jean-Luc Picard, 'All Good Things'


courtesy of Saquist
Reply With Quote
  #126  
Old 07-14-2010, 07:35 PM
Futureguy Futureguy is offline
Commander
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin View Post
Figured.
Here is still hoping for a ST series, even if it is another ship and crew TNG or later. Even the AU version would be good, with another ship and crew, but I'm thinking that the AU would be better served by just keeping it to movie episodes.
Reply With Quote
  #127  
Old 07-14-2010, 10:06 PM
Futureguy Futureguy is offline
Commander
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,153
Default

If there are no moderators on this board anymore, why are there still members being welcomed with current acceptance dates?
Reply With Quote
  #128  
Old 07-15-2010, 03:37 AM
kevin's Avatar
kevin kevin is offline
Federation Councillor
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: East Kilbride, Glasgow, UK
Posts: 21,077
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Futureguy View Post
Here is still hoping for a ST series, even if it is another ship and crew TNG or later. Even the AU version would be good, with another ship and crew, but I'm thinking that the AU would be better served by just keeping it to movie episodes.
Well, CBS can't use the Paramount AU as far as I understand (which may be wrong but has been inferred over the past couple of years be a few) so they would have to create a third AU of their own if they wanted to go down that route.

Or do another show somewhere within the PU. In which case I personally would prefer another jump ahead (25th Century etc) than yet another attempt to fill a 'gap' in the history of the PU.
__________________
'If the Apocalypse starts, beep me!' - Buffy Summers
'The sky's the limit.....' Jean-Luc Picard, 'All Good Things'


courtesy of Saquist
Reply With Quote
  #129  
Old 07-15-2010, 06:10 AM
Futureguy Futureguy is offline
Commander
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,153
Default

[quote=kevin;305075]Well, CBS...
...so they would have to create a third AU of their own if they wanted to go down that route.

Yea, they could do one where Spock comes through the vortex.......ahead of Nero. Kelvin is spared and SF is given a good advance notice of Nero's eventual appearance and he is then met by a force that is adequately prepared to defeat him.
Reply With Quote
  #130  
Old 07-15-2010, 06:54 AM
starbase63's Avatar
starbase63 starbase63 is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Connecticut, USA
Posts: 1,727
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by Futureguy View Post
If there are no moderators on this board anymore, why are there still members being welcomed with current acceptance dates?
New members can register...but no one is approving their accounts...so they will not be able to post.

When was the last time you saw a post by a new member?

The new startrek.com went online last night...all I can say is, remember in STV when the Enterprise was in no shape to be sent to Nimbus III? That's what the new site is like...existing members can't get in, the store isn't working, some things look incomplete...overall, the only people on the boards are either brand new members, existing members who have made dual accounts, or plants who seem to be the ones saying how great the new site is.
__________________
Never keep a Vulcan waiting...
Admin, sb63's Star Trek Logs, member of the Trek Webmaster Program
STL is now also on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/StarTrekLogs
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:05 PM.


Forum theme courtesy of Mark Lambert
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 by Paramount Pictures. STAR TREK and all related
marks and logos are trademarks of CBS Studios Inc. All Rights Reserved.