The Official Star Trek Movie Forum

The Official Star Trek Movie Forum > Star Trek > General Star Trek Discussions > TV Shows > The Next Generation > Galaxy Class Mark III
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 07-23-2009, 04:24 AM
Zardoz's Avatar
Zardoz Zardoz is offline
Federation Councillor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Somewhere In The Future
Posts: 31,432
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Commodore View Post
I prefer the original Galaxy-class design. It all flows together well (although Roddenberry apparently had the nacelles slightly shortened from the original design by Andrew Probert).

It's not a design, however, that holds up well to a lot of kitbashing, (with the possible exception being the Nebula-class), IMO.
Good point. The same could not be said of the Sovergien Class.
__________________
"High Priestesses Of Zardoz" By Eliza's Starbase Of Avatars Copyright 2009."
"Zardoz Speaks To You, His Choosen Trek Fans."
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 08-02-2009, 02:42 PM
DNA-1842's Avatar
DNA-1842 DNA-1842 is offline
Vice Admiral
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland, Europe, Terra - ZZ9 PluralZAlpha
Posts: 3,594
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Commodore View Post
I prefer the original Galaxy-class design. It all flows together well (although Roddenberry apparently had the nacelles slightly shortened from the original design by Andrew Probert).

It's not a design, however, that holds up well to a lot of kitbashing, (with the possible exception being the Nebula-class), IMO.
Roddenberry apparently had them lengthened...

http://www.starshipdatalink.net/art/1701-d.html
__________________
Gronda Gronda to all Zarking Hoopy Froods! Bowties are cool.
I Am A Friend Of


(And an indirectly founding patron of the Elizadolots Avatar Thingy.)
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 08-06-2009, 09:12 AM
Commodore's Avatar
Commodore Commodore is offline
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Starbase 24
Posts: 2,511
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DNA-1842 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Commodore
I prefer the original Galaxy-class design. It all flows together well (although Roddenberry apparently had the nacelles slightly shortened from the original design by Andrew Probert).

It's not a design, however, that holds up well to a lot of kitbashing, (with the possible exception being the Nebula-class), IMO.
Roddenberry apparently had them lengthened...

http://www.starshipdatalink.net/art/1701-d.html
A typo I didn't notice until now (typed shortened instead of lengthened).

Personally, I wouldn't have minded if they went with Probert's original idea for the nacelles...
__________________
Free your mind, and the rest will follow.
--En Vogue
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:26 PM.


Forum theme courtesy of Mark Lambert
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 by Paramount Pictures. STAR TREK and all related
marks and logos are trademarks of CBS Studios Inc. All Rights Reserved.