The Official Star Trek Movie Forum

The Official Star Trek Movie Forum > Star Trek > Star Trek XI: The Movie > Should Earht have been taken out too? Or instead?
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-01-2009, 01:13 PM
PrairieDawn PrairieDawn is offline
Ensign
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland at present
Posts: 23
Default Should Earht have been taken out too? Or instead?

Hmmmmmm....

Late, as in the late DentArthurDent.
__________________
Faith Manages--Delenn
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-01-2009, 01:19 PM
Yagami Crewman's Avatar
Yagami Crewman Yagami Crewman is offline
Commander
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Goose Creek, South Carolina
Posts: 1,141
Default

I'm kinda partial to Earth and as that would reduce humanity to refugees and humans make up the target audience for this movie, wouldn't that turn Star Trek's promise of a bright future into another. "Stupid humans got trashed again..." scenario?
__________________
Ever notice that many of the same people who want variety in life frown very hard on vanilla... But without Vanilla, Baskin Robbins just wouldn't BE 31 flavors.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-01-2009, 01:21 PM
Vincent Cain's Avatar
Vincent Cain Vincent Cain is offline
Commander
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,488
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yagami Crewman View Post
I'm kinda partial to Earth and as that would reduce humanity to refugees and humans make up the target audience for this movie, wouldn't that turn Star Trek's promise of a bright future into another. "Stupid humans got trashed again..." scenario?
Yeah, pretty much.
I mean, isn't Earth always getting picked on in Sci-Fi films these last few years?
Armageddon, War of The Worlds, The Day The Earth Stood Still (Gods, how I hated that film.....)
Pick on another planet for a change, right?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-01-2009, 01:23 PM
PrairieDawn PrairieDawn is offline
Ensign
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland at present
Posts: 23
Default

(I actually don't like the idea, myself, but I thought I'd throw it out there as a thought experiment.)
__________________
Faith Manages--Delenn
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-01-2009, 01:47 PM
DNA-1842's Avatar
DNA-1842 DNA-1842 is offline
Vice Admiral
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland, Europe, Terra - ZZ9 PluralZAlpha
Posts: 3,594
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PrairieDawn View Post
Hmmmmmm....

Late, as in the late DentArthurDent.
"It's a sort of threat, you see. I've never been any good at them myself but I'm told they can be terribly effective!"
I'm a great fan of science, you know."

[But Earth being destroyed would be a terrible distraction for the writers, because despite the fact that the Federation allegedly has over 100 members planets, it always boils down to humans and Earth...]
__________________
Gronda Gronda to all Zarking Hoopy Froods! Bowties are cool.
I Am A Friend Of


(And an indirectly founding patron of the Elizadolots Avatar Thingy.)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-01-2009, 01:48 PM
Thascales Thascales is offline
Commander
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 978
Default

If they took out Earth, the Trek universe would be a very, very different animal, that's for sure. I'm too distracted atm to really think about the implications, but it's an interesting question.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-01-2009, 01:54 PM
Star Trek Viewer Star Trek Viewer is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,057
Default

In my new story for the sequel to this movie, the Earth disappears at the end, as a cliffhanger. I've posted the story in another thread.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-01-2009, 04:09 PM
TJJones's Avatar
TJJones TJJones is offline
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Monterey, CA
Posts: 341
Default

I have to agree with the majority of responders here and say that destroying Earth would probably lose the decidedly-Earth-centric target audience of the movie.

The premise of Star Trek is that we get past all of our stupidity (okay, at least most of it) and work together to create a better universe. Destroying Earth would distract from that goal, especially since Earth is the heart of the Federation.

I would even go so far as to say Star Fleet would be so crippled that it would no longer be a viable organization and, without the "human glue" that holds the member worlds of the Federation together, I think the organization would come apart amid the squabbling between old rivals. (Without Earth to hold them back, the Andorians would have a field day

Think about it: it was Archer and Earth that first started to get the disparate and uncooperative Vulcans, Andorians and Tellarites to work together in the mid-2150s. Earth quickly became the political center of the fledgling Federation in the 2160s with the establishment of Star Fleet Headquarters in San Francisco and, presumably, the other Federation offices on Earth.

Humans often seemed to be the "middle ground" between the extremes of the other founding members' cultures (similar, in a way, to the American-centric perception that the presence of the United States in NATO was what held together groups like the Greeks and Turks, British and French...not saying that was the truth, but the perception from some points of view). The loss of that anchor would effectively kill the body (perhaps similar to how the League of Nations, minus the "keystone" of the United States, was a completely skewed body that chose punishment over peaceful reconciliation and ultimately led to WWII).

No, the Federation, as presented in Star Trek, could not survive without Earth. And, without the Federation, Star Trek would be just another dystopic future where humans are just trying to survive after a disaster.

I prefer to keep my Star Trek optimistic, thank you.
with the depleted Vulcans.)
__________________
Davy Jones
Your Friendly, Neighborhood, Navy Vet!

The United States Navy: Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of all Who Threaten It!

"I can imagine no more rewarding a career. And any man who may be asked in this century what he did to make his life worthwhile, I think can respond with a good deal of pride and satisfaction: 'I served in the United States Navy.'" -President John F. Kennedy


Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-01-2009, 10:03 PM
kevin's Avatar
kevin kevin is offline
Federation Councillor
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: East Kilbride, Glasgow, UK
Posts: 21,046
Default

I wouldn't have a problem with it. I don't beleieve it should get special 'protection' treatment from the writers.

If Vulcan and Romulus can go - so can Earth.
__________________
'If the Apocalypse starts, beep me!' - Buffy Summers
'The sky's the limit.....' Jean-Luc Picard, 'All Good Things'


courtesy of Saquist
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-01-2009, 10:21 PM
Samuel Samuel is offline
Vice Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,882
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin View Post
If Vulcan and Romulus can go - so can Earth.
One thing at a time, kevin. One thing at a time.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:10 AM.


Forum theme courtesy of Mark Lambert
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 by Paramount Pictures. STAR TREK and all related
marks and logos are trademarks of CBS Studios Inc. All Rights Reserved.