The Official Star Trek Movie Forum

The Official Star Trek Movie Forum > Star Trek > Star Trek XI: The Movie > Size of the New Enterprise (possible spoilers)
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1181  
Old 05-20-2009, 09:18 PM
CDH-313's Avatar
CDH-313 CDH-313 is offline
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 302
Default

That would give us 2470 feet, just so ya' know.
__________________
. . . just an old-school Trekker getting by in a newfangled galaxy.
Reply With Quote
  #1182  
Old 05-20-2009, 09:48 PM
jevans64's Avatar
jevans64 jevans64 is offline
Lieutenant, Junior Grade
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Madison, AL
Posts: 116
Default

*** Attention *** Size of the new Enterprise is FINAL!!! *** This thread can now be closed ***

I have calculated the EXACT length in meters of the new Enterprise using the following method...

100's = 2d4, 10's = 1d10 ( purple ), 1's = 1d10 ( red )

[drum roll] 2d4 = 4 * 100 = 400, P 1d10 = 8 = 80, R 1d10 = 7...

There you have it!!! The new Enterprise is 487 meters long.

If YOU GUYS aren't satisfied with that number, then get your own D&D dice and give it a go.
Reply With Quote
  #1183  
Old 05-20-2009, 10:01 PM
AyanEva AyanEva is offline
Commander
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,452
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saquist View Post
That might be as logical as this gets...

Shoot. What are all the numbers again? Including the original Enterprise size and twice that because those were offered up too.

900
762
305(?)
297(?)
Then there was a 400 in there wasn't there? And something with a decimal that Bad Robot gave, I think. Did anyone write these down in one place (or have a better memory than I do)?

I know the third and fourth numbers are off.

Guh. I gotta get to bed, though. I'll search through the thread tomorrow unless someone else does it first. We're adding and averaging.
Reply With Quote
  #1184  
Old 05-20-2009, 10:01 PM
CDH-313's Avatar
CDH-313 CDH-313 is offline
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 302
Default

Hey, I think I have a d1000 around here somewhere . . .
__________________
. . . just an old-school Trekker getting by in a newfangled galaxy.
Reply With Quote
  #1185  
Old 05-20-2009, 10:16 PM
jevans64's Avatar
jevans64 jevans64 is offline
Lieutenant, Junior Grade
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Madison, AL
Posts: 116
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CDH-313 View Post
Hey, I think I have a d1000 around here somewhere . . .
Wouldn't work that way. You have to use smaller die to create a range. I chose 2d4 ( two 4-sided dice ) to get a range from 2 to 8.

I have a d100 but it is so rounded that it takes FOREVER to stop on a number. I just use two different-colored 10-sided dice to generate 1 to 100. I have a HUGE felt bag full of dice. They look like the gems you are always questing for in D&D when they are all in their blue felt bag.

Ayan... I think that BadRobot number was 725.35 meters.

The 470 meter number came from a couple of people that added their 2 cents to this thread. That number was based on reasonable scale comparison of external ports and windows between TMP and NuEnt. The only thing that throws a wrench into that figure is the shuttle bay. The 470 meter number seems right -- not too big -- not too small -- and the exteriors seem to match up pretty well with that number.

I honestly feel that the shuttle bay doesn't match up with the rest of the ship because this was a real-world set and needed to be a certain size for people and props ( like plywood shuttles ). Same with the "engineering" interior, which was a brewery / factory location.

It IS weird that I took out my D&D dice and rolled a number close to it. I tried it again and rolled a 596.

Last edited by jevans64 : 05-20-2009 at 10:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #1186  
Old 05-20-2009, 10:38 PM
Buckman's Avatar
Buckman Buckman is offline
Lieutenant, Junior Grade
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 181
Default

its 295 m long
Reply With Quote
  #1187  
Old 05-20-2009, 10:48 PM
tufy tufy is offline
Ensign
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 24
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saquist View Post
Actually that's just over half Voyager's weight and 3 times as long.

Sam Launching a carrier by sliding it off the yard craddle into the sea is different from launching 495,000 Metric tones....or even contstructing it on the planet.

Not logical.
We're talking about a society that can warp space and generate artificial gravity (and even antigravity, as observed before). Starfleet shuttles have no proper aerodynamic properties, yet fly just fine. Canon-wise, we've seen Intrepid class land and take off from planet just fine. If you remember TNG: Parallels, there's a shot of Utopia Planitia ground facilities which house a partially constructed Galaxy class vessel:

http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/me...a_Planitia.jpg

So, we already have TNG proof that things can be constructed on ground. The biggest stretch is thus having Enterprise built at Riverside instead of San Francisco shipyard. According to Orci, the construction yard was there to honor George Kirk, but I don't think it would be much of a stretch to call Riverside shipyard the ground facilities, with San Francisco dock in orbit for finishing touches and refits, i.e. a similar layout to Utopia Planitia in 2370.
Reply With Quote
  #1188  
Old 05-20-2009, 10:51 PM
CDH-313's Avatar
CDH-313 CDH-313 is offline
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 302
Default

The figure I offered as an average (2,470 feet) was based on the 4 sourced numbers we've been given in feet: 2,000, 2,379.75, 2,500, & 3,000. Converting to meters, it would be approx. 753m. It's not my number, just an average of the numbers we've been given with ILM & Bad Robot sources. Again, just so ya' know.
__________________
. . . just an old-school Trekker getting by in a newfangled galaxy.
Reply With Quote
  #1189  
Old 05-20-2009, 11:18 PM
Thascales Thascales is offline
Commander
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 978
Default

I'll figure something out with my bucket of d10s. :P
Reply With Quote
  #1190  
Old 05-20-2009, 11:24 PM
Thascales Thascales is offline
Commander
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 978
Default

Oh guys! I just found a new interview with ILM. Apparently, and this is now final, the ship is 2500+587j feet long.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:14 PM.


Forum theme courtesy of Mark Lambert
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 by Paramount Pictures. STAR TREK and all related
marks and logos are trademarks of CBS Studios Inc. All Rights Reserved.