The Official Star Trek Movie Forum

The Official Star Trek Movie Forum > Star Trek > Star Trek XI: The Movie > Quinto: Movie is physical
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-31-2009, 04:48 PM
SouthernSpockette's Avatar
SouthernSpockette SouthernSpockette is offline
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: TN
Posts: 529
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cjopbj View Post
Sure it does. He was very physical in the series and movies. Talked to whales, afterall. Have to be in good shape for that!

I liked the bit in that article where JJ tells him Tom Cruise did such and such and Quinto says "I'm not Tom Cruise." HA. Takes a lot to be yourself in Hollywood, I'd imagine.
Well it's probably not all Cruise's fault when it's all said and done, but Tom Cruise probably isn't a #1 role model to follow anyway. His behavior has a lot to contribute as to why his career isn't exactly soaring, at the moment. Getting psyched up is probably okay (from article), but I hope that "psyching up" isn't what lead to his couch jumping on Oprah. That didn't go over very well and whether fair or not, it seems to have hurt him in the end.
__________________
"Why is any object we don't understand always called 'a thing' ?" ~ Dr. Leonard H. McCoy, Star Trek: The Motion Picture
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-31-2009, 04:49 PM
omegaman's Avatar
omegaman omegaman is offline
Admiral
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Penrith NSW Australia
Posts: 4,613
Default

How come my reply jumped up a spot?
__________________
TREK IS TREK. WHATEVER THE TIMELINE!

The next TV Series should be called STARFLEET!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-31-2009, 04:55 PM
SouthernSpockette's Avatar
SouthernSpockette SouthernSpockette is offline
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: TN
Posts: 529
Default

Don't know but to answer your question, I believe his last movie was Valkerie (spelling?). It didn't do well, at all.

Oh, I'll bet I know what happened. I deleted and re-posted because I changed what I had to say and don't like that "last edited by..." notation at the bottom of the post. I won't do that anymore though, it can confuse the flow of the board for posts to be transposed that way. I'll just grin and bear the "edited" bit.
__________________
"Why is any object we don't understand always called 'a thing' ?" ~ Dr. Leonard H. McCoy, Star Trek: The Motion Picture

Last edited by SouthernSpockette : 03-31-2009 at 04:58 PM. Reason: added "Oh, I'll bet..."
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-31-2009, 04:57 PM
omegaman's Avatar
omegaman omegaman is offline
Admiral
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Penrith NSW Australia
Posts: 4,613
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthernSpockette View Post
Don't know but to answer your question, I believe his last movie was Valkerie (spelling?). It didn't do well, at all.
Thanks. I figured it wouldn't so I didn't bother going to see it. We're not big fans of Tom. Pitty Mat Damon wasn't in the Mission Impossible films.
__________________
TREK IS TREK. WHATEVER THE TIMELINE!

The next TV Series should be called STARFLEET!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-31-2009, 06:44 PM
cjopbj cjopbj is offline
Lieutenant Commander
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 581
Default

Heroes is coming to a crechendo at the same time as Star Trek begins. Quinto is the eye of the storm.
__________________
Happiness, at least, Sir.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:35 PM.


Forum theme courtesy of Mark Lambert
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 by Paramount Pictures. STAR TREK and all related
marks and logos are trademarks of CBS Studios Inc. All Rights Reserved.