The Official Star Trek Movie Forum

The Official Star Trek Movie Forum > Star Trek > Star Trek XI: The Movie > Canon Debate - Does it exist & is Canon important to you?
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 01-13-2009, 10:49 AM
Dominus of Megadeus's Avatar
Dominus of Megadeus Dominus of Megadeus is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,099
Default

I agree, Scribbler. I have found that everyone on this board I've read as a long time lurker, newly posting memeber, has been very cordial. People here have strong viewpoints, and disagree without being disagreeable. So, cheers to everyone here!

Of all the message boards I've met in my travels, this is the most...human!
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 01-13-2009, 10:58 AM
Dominus of Megadeus's Avatar
Dominus of Megadeus Dominus of Megadeus is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,099
Default

I had mentioned something on page 8 of this thread about how prophetic the writers of TOS were. Here's a couple of links you may find interesting.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/sc...er-451673.html (transporter technology).

http://healthcare.zdnet.com/?p=510 (medical tricorder).

They were visionary back in the 60s, and look what's coming to pass. What exciting things may arise if we allow others to express their vision!
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 01-13-2009, 11:03 AM
kevin's Avatar
kevin kevin is offline
Federation Councillor
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: East Kilbride, Glasgow, UK
Posts: 21,046
Default

The Tricorder was the one bit of treknology I always wanted to be real. I thought as a kid it would be the best gadget to have!

Nice article.
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 01-13-2009, 11:05 AM
Sybock's Avatar
Sybock Sybock is offline
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Sha Ka Ree (Vulcan Heaven)
Posts: 451
Default

Thank you so much to everyone who posted on this thread. I got the results I hoped for which was the opinions of the members in this forum. There has been some debates, but nothing too nasty and offensive, just differences of opinions. And I've learned a little more than I knew before.

One point crack me up early on in this thread and that it that Kirk couldn't drive a car in TOS and his younger self is driving a car in the trailer. Well, I laughed because young J.T.K. in the trailer cannot drive a car ...... It wouldn't have gone off the cliff if he could.

Anyway, great replys ..... Thank you again!
__________________
Spock: "Random chance seems to have operated in our favor"
McCoy: "In plain, non-Vulcan English, we've been lucky"
Spock: "I believe I said that, Doctor" (The Doomsday Machine)

Vulcan Smiley by DNA-1842
  #85  
Old 01-19-2009, 10:32 PM
phlashman phlashman is offline
Midshipman
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 17
Default

Is it important..."Yes". But rules can be bent (within reason)...Star Trek has a long history of it.
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 01-20-2009, 02:03 AM
Commodore's Avatar
Commodore Commodore is offline
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Starbase 24
Posts: 2,511
Default

I personally think that continuity is only important when dealing with historical events (regardless if it's real or fictional) and making sure everything all fits together, but canon only means whether a particular work is official or not by the property holder.

In the case of TOS and Star Trek XI, both will be considered canon even if they have different continuities.

IMO, since the split between Paramount's TV and movie divisions into separate companies owned by separate corporations (CBS and Viacom) who hate each other passionately, the days of Star Trek existing in a single shared universe are over...there is now the Star Trek Television Universe and the Star Trek Movie Universe, with Star Trek XI being the point where they diverge.
__________________
Free your mind, and the rest will follow.
--En Vogue
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 01-20-2009, 05:42 AM
Saquist's Avatar
Saquist Saquist is offline
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,257
Default

It only means both will be canon, we as fans make the mistake that they are the same canon.
__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:18 AM.


Forum theme courtesy of Mark Lambert
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 by Paramount Pictures. STAR TREK and all related
marks and logos are trademarks of CBS Studios Inc. All Rights Reserved.