The Official Star Trek Movie Forum

The Official Star Trek Movie Forum > Star Trek > General Star Trek Discussions > The height of Trek popularity?
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-01-2009, 12:59 PM
Gary Seven's Avatar
Gary Seven Gary Seven is offline
Lieutenant Commander
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 836
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Botany Bay View Post
Oversaturation? Oversaturation occurs whenever a show or a franchise gets lazy, repetitive, generic, uninspired, in other terms: Voyager.
Exactly. See also everything else past First Contact.
__________________
I AM ANOTHER FRIEND OF ZARDOZ:
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-01-2009, 01:08 PM
Big D's Avatar
Big D Big D is offline
Commander
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,112
Default

I'd say popularity peaked around the end of Next Generation. That's a time when the Original Series and Next Generation were both respected as iconic television, highly regarded both within and outside science fiction circles.
When All Good Things... aired in my country, in '95 I believe, there was a lot of advertising and excitement leading up to it. Prime-time advertising, and it was played in a prime-time slot on one of the major channels.

DS9, Voyager and Enterprise all started in prime-time on leading channels, but later disappeared, to be relegated to different channels or inferior timeslots.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-01-2009, 01:10 PM
kevin's Avatar
kevin kevin is offline
Federation Councillor
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: East Kilbride, Glasgow, UK
Posts: 21,077
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Seven View Post
Good points. But something else happened.

Over-saturation occurred at this point and one could almost see the beginning of the end. It was difficult to sustain the creative drive; particularly with the same people at the helm. For me, the height of popularity was the of the anticipation of something new emerging. It has occurred a few times during the life of Star Trek. And this fits perfectly with the ten cycle. Here we are.
Yes, there was clear over-saturation from the mid 1990s onwards. But as it was riding the crest of a wave of popularity, you're right in saying it was inevitable.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Botany Bay View Post
Oversaturation? Oversaturation occurs whenever a show or a franchise gets lazy, repetitive, generic, uninspired, in other terms: Voyager.
I tend to think those elements are a consequence of oversaturation, not a cause of it. To me, there should never have been 2 shows on the air at the same time, it worked very briefly to start with when it was TNG and DS9, but (and I know a lot love it, but I have to give my own opinion here) VOY was a series too far. Again it also was a problem that the same people's names kept cropping up behind the scenes - the creativity was simply diluted by being spread across too many hours of TV to be filled with something. And that was when lazy, repetitive and generic episodes came along too frequently. At least ENT had a shot on it's own, but it did nothing for me, and it still suffered from the same names. It seemed to get better, by all accounts, once the new blood of Manny Coto finally came aboard, it was just a bit too late it seems.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-02-2009, 07:55 AM
FanWriter45's Avatar
FanWriter45 FanWriter45 is offline
Vice Admiral
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Conway, Arkansas. It's a nice little town with three Universities in it, and surrounded by woods.
Posts: 3,051
Default

Probably about the time Shatner and Stewart hit the cover of Time Magazine.
__________________
Number Two: Conform, Number Six! Conform!

Number Six: I will not be stamped, filed, indexed, briefed, debriefed, or numbered! I am a person.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-02-2009, 04:33 PM
thypentacle's Avatar
thypentacle thypentacle is offline
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Eastern U.S.
Posts: 369
Default

Well I've only watched since 1987, but I do know the history of it pretty well... and I'd say Star Trek was at the top of its game right about the time Roddenberry died... 1991...

25th Anniversary buzz abound... TV specials... Vice President speaking about it highly on TV, Colin Powell visits set of TNG and talks of its great impact on technology of today and social overtones in the stories that tackle real world issues, and how the sets seem less alive with no sound F/X, lol...

Of course that's all rumor as he didn't exactly give a speech from the bridge or anything... etc etc... I may be off a year in one direction or the other, but mainly 1991 was the top to me... though Trek did maintain a certain high level for about 5 more years till 1996ish, and First Contact helped things go up a bit for a very short time. Just my view of it anyways...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:07 PM.


Forum theme courtesy of Mark Lambert
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 by Paramount Pictures. STAR TREK and all related
marks and logos are trademarks of CBS Studios Inc. All Rights Reserved.