|
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#41
|
||||
|
||||
|
I love the Entperprise A. Beautiful ship.
__________________
|
|
#42
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The NCC-1701-A came after Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home... She was the U.S.S. Yorktown recommissioned as the Enterprise. Me = 1 You = 0 ![]() Edit**: Oh wait...I'm an ***. You said AFTER III....technically you are right. Me = -1 You = 2 Blast you. |
|
#43
|
||||
|
||||
|
Isn't ST IV sometime after ST III?
__________________
I have seen the darkness in my soul and shine brighter for it. |
|
#44
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes Yes...We've been over this.
![]() |
|
#45
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
That is, the last one - the "A" - is the only ship of the set that even looks like it has any depth or chance of being "real". The newest Enterprise (the one in the middle) looks like a toy, and the classic Enterprise looks like an old toy. |
|
#46
|
||||
|
||||
|
You're right.
it is the only ship that has the chance of being real.
__________________
|
|
#47
|
||||
|
||||
|
lol...because of those 3 pictures...only the 1701-A is the ship still using the actual film model.
The TOS is a CGI version of the original, and the Abramsprise is equally CGI.
__________________
I have seen the darkness in my soul and shine brighter for it. |
|
#48
|
||||
|
||||
|
CGI is too perfect.
It can't recreate the minor imperfects that make things look real.
__________________
|
|
#49
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I've always liked the "A" alot because it does look real. I think JJ's ship looks real too though. JJ's ship has a certain "toughness" that the others just don't have. But that's just my opinion... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|