|
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#41
11-18-2008, 06:05 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Im just curious redshirt, will the Viral site Ncc1701.com be updated as well? I mean you might as well update it since the enterprise has been revealed and we have seen the bridge and corridors already. Now how about positioning those "cameras" someplace else, hmm?
__________________
ALL PRAISE TO ZARDOZ! GREAT SCOTT!!! ANOTHER FRIEND OF ZARDOZ! 
|
|
#42
11-18-2008, 07:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
A skeptic no more
From the time I first learned Abrams was at the helm of the franchise, I was probably the hardest to convince that he was actually going to pull this off. In fact, I have posted in many forums suggesting that he was going to treat Star Trek to yet another Hollywood Hump and Dump and leave fans alienated and angry. It was refreshing to see that what we got was a triple-shot espresso with a redbull chaser. Wow! Friggin' awesome! The interior shots of the new Enterprise were crisp, vital, mysterious, yet sophisticated. It felt like that "X" factor that we all didn't realize we needed until we finally got it, then wondered how we ever lived without it. No longer do the corridors of the enterprise look like the hallways of a Red Roof Inn (1701-D). And the characters; wow, again! Spock's violent side! Sulu plummeting along side the alien drilling machine; they are actually heros again. I guess I'd forgotten they could be more than simply console-jockey's deciding the fate of their foes with a push of the "fire phaser" button in front of them. They have actually re-introduced real risk to the equation. I know we have all just seen snippets of what is yet to be and that is ok. Based on what I have seen, I am sold and very thirsty for more. Thank you sir, may I have another.
|
|
#43
11-18-2008, 07:31 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Am i missng something??? I'm stillseeing the same old trailer on the official site...and now it says 2days 11hours 31mins
|
|
#44
11-18-2008, 07:34 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
*But a simple refresh of the page worked for me. Last edited by Ferrous : 11-18-2008 at 07:40 PM.
|
|
#45
11-18-2008, 07:57 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Looks nice.
__________________
"After a time, you may find that having is not so pleasing a thing, after all, as wanting. It is not logical, but it is often true."
|
|
#46
11-18-2008, 08:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#47
11-18-2008, 08:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
right you are
Certainly, were it not for the long, agonizing wait, Christmas would be just another day of the week.
|
|
#48
11-18-2008, 11:21 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Site and Trailer
Hi all...I am new here, and my first post.
I was very impressed with what I saw, and even my wife said it looked good.  I was skeptical at first, when I heard about the new movie, but after seeing the trailer, I am putting this movie on my list!
|
|
#49
11-19-2008, 05:48 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Clock, that is a sweet edit
 Also, check out http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/19/trek...iler-analysis/ for an article of screencaps & spoilers.
__________________
To bathe a cat takes brute force, perseverance, courage of conviction - and a cat. The last ingredient is usually hardest to come by. - Stephen Baker
|
|
#50
11-19-2008, 09:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
This from Slashdot: Why are almost ALL new movie trailers hosted by Apple, with each requiring Quicktime. And why does every new trailer seem to REQUIRE me to update to the latest version of that bloated, memory-gobbling, unwanted startup service inserting, file association stealing, iTunes pushing crap just to play a damned VIDEO?
I agree. Now, I admit to being a fan of ALL the incarnations, although DS9 and Enterprise were kinda lame. How about instead of going BACK in time with these boring "action" prequels, go more FORWARD in time - isn't that what sci fi is all about?
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:57 AM.