The Official Star Trek Movie Forum

The Official Star Trek Movie Forum > Star Trek > General Star Trek Discussions > TV Shows > Voyager > If we could go back in time and re-do Voyager....
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-10-2008, 03:15 PM
buffs79's Avatar
buffs79 buffs79 is offline
Commander
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 953
Default If we could go back in time and re-do Voyager....

First off. that ship get's damaged? No Star fleet parts, so let's find some alien allies to help. After awhile, Voyager would look much different.

Voyager get's assimilated. Minimal repairs. The aria still retains a Borg look.

Be less PC. Go out to the limits, address real issues facing society.

USE MODELS! The CGI in Voyager looked terrible, today, I'd still use models, they just look sooooo much better

Introduce plots that would have aliens join the crew


any other ideas?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-10-2008, 03:41 PM
HRH The KING's Avatar
HRH The KING HRH The KING is offline
Lieutenant Commander
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Royal Estates
Posts: 733
Default

No reset button.


That one suggestion could have vastly improved VOY by forcing them to address problems that carry over from week to week, instead of having a perfect pristine ship with endless supplies and limitless energy every episode.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-10-2008, 03:52 PM
Saquist's Avatar
Saquist Saquist is offline
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,257
Default

I'm with you Buff...
models are just plain better. But Voyager used CGI appropriately.
It was DS9 that litteraly destroyed good taste with those CGI battles.


CGI is just cheaper...it's only when you have money to burn you use models...
Like Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-10-2008, 03:58 PM
horatio's Avatar
horatio horatio is offline
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 9,282
Default

The interesting thing is that LORD was cheap compared to other blockbusters.
Wikipedia lists a budget of 280 million $ for a runtime of about 11 hourse for the extended version cut. If we compare this to the 150 million $ budget / 100 minutes of the upcoming movie, which is around the order of many other blockbusters, it costs about four times as much as LOTR per minute of film.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-10-2008, 04:00 PM
Saquist's Avatar
Saquist Saquist is offline
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,257
Default

Then I stand corrected.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-10-2008, 04:00 PM
MrQ1701's Avatar
MrQ1701 MrQ1701 is offline
Vice Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Espanola, New Mexico
Posts: 3,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HRH The KING View Post
No reset button.


That one suggestion could have vastly improved VOY by forcing them to address problems that carry over from week to week, instead of having a perfect pristine ship with endless supplies and limitless energy every episode.
You need to watch more VOY. There are many episodes where the crew is searching for supplies and raw materials. Same goes for episode regarding the very limited supply of energy.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-10-2008, 04:03 PM
horatio's Avatar
horatio horatio is offline
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 9,282
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saquist View Post
Then I stand corrected.
I was quite surprised when I saw these numbers the first time. With all those large models, the thousands of self-produced props and weapons I always thought that it had to be a very costly production. Perhaps the folks in New Zealand just work more efficiently.
But I think there is some tendency to go away from CGI to more real stuff in he last years, Dark Knight did a lot of things in real and JJ et also said that they tried to reduce blue screen shootings, although the ships will probably be pure CGI.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-10-2008, 04:12 PM
Saquist's Avatar
Saquist Saquist is offline
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,257
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by horatio View Post
I was quite surprised when I saw these numbers the first time. With all those large models, the thousands of self-produced props and weapons I always thought that it had to be a very costly production. Perhaps the folks in New Zealand just work more efficiently.
But I think there is some tendency to go away from CGI to more real stuff in he last years, Dark Knight did a lot of things in real and JJ et also said that they tried to reduce blue screen shootings, although the ships will probably be pure CGI.
Dark Knight
Another Film that many will aspire to...but never achieve.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-10-2008, 04:45 PM
BlackBox's Avatar
BlackBox BlackBox is offline
Lieutenant, Junior Grade
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 176
Default

First, ditch the entire cast.

Second, ditch all the characters.

The plot is fine, though, but the actual show just turned into MELROSE PLACE IN SPACE -- was so lame
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-10-2008, 04:53 PM
MrQ1701's Avatar
MrQ1701 MrQ1701 is offline
Vice Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Espanola, New Mexico
Posts: 3,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackBox View Post
First, ditch the entire cast.

Second, ditch all the characters.

The plot is fine, though, but the actual show just turned into MELROSE PLACE IN SPACE -- was so lame
in what ways was Voyager a "melrose place in space"?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:34 PM.


Forum theme courtesy of Mark Lambert
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 by Paramount Pictures. STAR TREK and all related
marks and logos are trademarks of CBS Studios Inc. All Rights Reserved.