The Official Star Trek Movie Forum

The Official Star Trek Movie Forum > Star Trek > General Star Trek Discussions > TV Shows > Enterprise > Should Archer get a warp 7 ship to command in a new series...
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-05-2009, 03:50 PM
omegaman's Avatar
omegaman omegaman is offline
Admiral
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Penrith NSW Australia
Posts: 4,613
Default Should Archer get a warp 7 ship to command in a new series...

We all know Archers Enterprise was being mothballed at the end of season 4 and that there was talk of the new warp seven ships coming of the production line very soon, so should a new series of Enterprise be created with Archer and his crew warping around the galaxy in a Constitution (or similar) style Enterprise?
__________________
TREK IS TREK. WHATEVER THE TIMELINE!

The next TV Series should be called STARFLEET!

Last edited by omegaman : 01-05-2009 at 04:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-05-2009, 04:07 PM
horatio's Avatar
horatio horatio is offline
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 9,282
Default

First, each crew for its ship. Second, I always imagined that Archer becomes an admiral and serves on Earth before he becomes President of the UFP. Third, the interesting things would have happened during the late 2150s, Earth-Romulan War and the founding of the Federation, so as much as I would love to see another 22nd century show with the warp 7 Daedalus class, it would not work and feel weird without those events depicted in the last three would-have-been seasons of ENT.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-05-2009, 04:18 PM
omegaman's Avatar
omegaman omegaman is offline
Admiral
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Penrith NSW Australia
Posts: 4,613
Default

I tend to think that Archer was really deep down an explorer at heart who learned a great lesson and was tempered by his experiences with the Xindi.

I think, given the chance at being an Admiral or commanding a warp seven ship that he would have jumped at the latter and put his career on hold for at least another 5 years. Archer would relish the chance to explore the parts of the galaxy that only a warp seven ship could provide.
__________________
TREK IS TREK. WHATEVER THE TIMELINE!

The next TV Series should be called STARFLEET!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-06-2009, 03:14 AM
horatio's Avatar
horatio horatio is offline
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 9,282
Default

Good point. Although 11 years of run-time seems a little short for the NX-class, the velocity increase from warp 5 to warp 7 might make it pretty much obsolete. And as you don't necessarily retire after 11 years in space, why not serve on a new Starship class.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-06-2009, 12:55 PM
Commodore's Avatar
Commodore Commodore is offline
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Starbase 24
Posts: 2,511
Default

I vote for the U.S.S. Voyager, NCC-156, as Archer's next ship...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-06-2009, 01:04 PM
DNA-1842's Avatar
DNA-1842 DNA-1842 is offline
Vice Admiral
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland, Europe, Terra - ZZ9 PluralZAlpha
Posts: 3,594
Default

I vote for Defiant to come first!
__________________
Gronda Gronda to all Zarking Hoopy Froods! Bowties are cool.
I Am A Friend Of


(And an indirectly founding patron of the Elizadolots Avatar Thingy.)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-06-2009, 01:50 PM
Datalore's Avatar
Datalore Datalore is offline
Lieutenant, Junior Grade
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 190
Default

Archer was a great captain stuck in the wrong time, the series should have takin place after next gen.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-06-2009, 02:00 PM
CAPTAIN MOUSE's Avatar
CAPTAIN MOUSE CAPTAIN MOUSE is offline
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Placerville,CA
Posts: 2,564
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Datalore View Post
Archer was a great captain stuck in the wrong time, the series should have takin place after next gen.
Maybe one of Jonathan Archer's decendants becomes the Captain of the the Enterprise NCC-1701-F.

Yeah I know sheer fanboy reasoning here
__________________
CAN YOU CATCH SECOND HAND STUPIDITY? OR SHOULD I BE CONCERNED ABOUT THE WATER HERE? - JEFF DUNHAM
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-25-2009, 06:33 AM
jla1987's Avatar
jla1987 jla1987 is offline
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,483
Default

Enterprise would have been more accepted had it taken place in the 24th+ century and that would have provided for future properties. As it stands now, we'll never see another Archer show.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-08-2009, 03:49 AM
Sovereign506's Avatar
Sovereign506 Sovereign506 is offline
Ensign
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: in the best state of middle Germany
Posts: 67
Default

I also think that Archer would take the chance to command a new warp 7 starship but I don't think that soon means soon. To reach warp 7 starfleet needs a far more powerfull warpcore. This one would be to big to fit in an Daedalus-Class vessel. So I think the first ship that was big enough to carry such a core was an Constitution-Class vessel. And in the time they were constructed Archer would be an Admiral or to old to serve as an acting Captain.
__________________
The end is only the beginning!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:15 PM.


Forum theme courtesy of Mark Lambert
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 by Paramount Pictures. STAR TREK and all related
marks and logos are trademarks of CBS Studios Inc. All Rights Reserved.