View Single Post
Old 06-20-2012, 03:01 PM
Saquist's Avatar
Saquist Saquist is offline
Fleet Admiral
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,257

Originally Posted by Akula2ssn View Post
Right, I just saw that. It's not the first time that they've named ships for political reasons. That's the main reason why every 688-class except for maybe one was named after a major city.

Didn't even realize the Zumwalt was back in the works. I thought that disaster died years ago. Well I suppose that's not entirely true. They just reinvented it with the DDX. As for JSF, that was just a bad idea from its very inception. Trying to spin it as a "lower cost" alternative to the F-22 didn't help either. It left the F-22 in the dust a while ago in terms of cost.

As far as the name...It's the oldest name in the US Navy with a history that really is unlike any other ship in the fleet, particularly during WWII. If he can't see past a pop culture reference to the importance that name has in his own Navy then quite frankly it's not a problem with the name, it's his problem. A ship's name should have meaning like Yorktown, Lake Champlain, Bob Hope, John Paul Jones, Higgins, Mercy, Comfort, Bunker Hill, and on occasion a political figure such as Washington or Lincoln. But I digress. Afterall I'm nothing more than a puddle pirate. Hell we have a buoy tender named the Henry Blake, the first lighthouse keeper at New Dungeness.
I've seen some Navy Guys actively campaigning against the the political naming trend through private sites. Who want to see ships named fore their significant engagements that defined and honored those that sacrificed their lives for the country. They say it's the best way to honor them all without individual names. I think I agree. I think ships like the USS Laffey should be moved on.

Reply With Quote