View Single Post
  #13  
Old 11-10-2011, 03:20 PM
omegaman's Avatar
omegaman omegaman is offline
Admiral
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Penrith NSW Australia
Posts: 4,609
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saquist View Post
I don't know if it's going to be cancelled...but with it taking this long just to start I wouldn't be surprised. Remember the delays with the first. If anything I wonder if the third movie will happen since they are taking so much time. It's going to be a decade long affair and that tends to ward off both actors and directors alike.

Even George Lucas didn't want to do the new trillogy at first because, and I quote " It takes a decade out of my life." and that's a HIGHLY SOUGHT trillogy that was done on schedule...it just makes me wonder about Trek being completed. Most of the time it's a two year turn around on a sequel or like some others even sooner because they drop the last two within 6 months of each other...which I think says how much they don't like doing lengthy trilogies.
When I first heard it was going to be delayed I wasn't pleased at all. Its too long between drinks so to speak. They had plenty of time to say this was a hit and get the ball rolling on the next, but alas they dropped the ball and now we have to wait. I think that's a mistake. Wether it will adversely affect the next movie in some way is yet to be seen.
__________________
TREK IS TREK. WHATEVER THE TIMELINE!

The next TV Series should be called STARFLEET!
Reply With Quote