Thread: iNcEpTiOn
View Single Post
Old 07-20-2010, 03:00 AM
martok2112's Avatar
martok2112 martok2112 is offline
Fleet Admiral
Join Date: May 2008
Location: River Ridge, LA
Posts: 6,480

Originally Posted by kevin View Post
I admired Inception and it's intentions, however it's not a film I'm ever going to 'love'. As mind-twisters go it's ok but not really as grandly original as I was lead to believe going in. Unfortunately I think Nolan has been so busy working on the mind-twister side of the story that he's been sitting on that he forgot to craft characters that I (and others going by some of the reviews I've read) could actually care about.

Which is not to say I didn't like it - it gets the brain gears moving, it invites discussion and it will for years to come. That's hardly ever a bad thing. And I'll go and see it again soon to see what happens on reviewing it with knowledge of the whole thing.

The upshot being that (no spoilers - but much of the discussion subsequent to people viewing the film is around the meaning (or meanings) of the whole film implied by the final scene) when I don't have a good reason to actually care which of the main options it might be the film has failed.

Now, I know already that I'm going to be in the minority on this movie because I shall be in the side of appreciating it technically but not thinking it's actually quite as good as the majority will claim it is - or rather, are already claiming it is on the wider web amongst reviewers both professional and armchair.

The Matrix comparison is probably not entirely unfounded - but then again, I think The Matrix movies suck and have done since 1999 so.........
Although I've not seen the film yet, I get the sense that the lack of originality stems from the notion that there was another movie (years ago) that sort of dealt with this thing.....a movie starring Dennis Quaid, Max Von Sydow, Kate Capshaw and David Patrick Kelley called "DreamScape". It was a pretty cool flick for its time.

Reply With Quote