Originally Posted by starbase63
I guess MGM doesn't want to share Bond with another production company or companies?
Paramount shared Star Trek with Spyglass for the latest movie...
James Bond has always been a moneymaker for MGM/United Artists, it seems odd they'd shelf something that could help their difficulties.
If MGM did go bust, who would be the most likely to buy such properties as "Bond" and "Stargate", if they were not selectively sold to another studio by MGM to raise money?