Key words being "so far" and "looks like"... not "after seeing the film" and "absolutely is."
I'm saying people are leaping to vast conclusions based on minimal, incomplete information... assuming because they don't know an explanation, that no explanation can exist.
I'm willing to see for myself... as evidence exists from the film's creators that explanations for many of these changes DO exist in the film, and by design. That's evidence I see many arguers here perfectly willing to ignore while they leap to conclusions on an out-of-context photograph and a narrow idea of what TREK should be.
MISSION:TREK's in-depth review of STAR TREK
Proud member of the Friends of Zardoz Association. Avatar courtesy of Eliza's House of Avatars with three convenient locations near you. Free balloons for the kids!