View Single Post
  #15  
Old 11-28-2008, 11:56 PM
Saquist's Avatar
Saquist Saquist is offline
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,257
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by radoskal View Post
look here




Now between the three of em, I gotta say. The Original is fine and upstanding, the refit (my fave) is spectacular, and the New one...well, from the picture it does in fact look like nothing to write home about.

The engine Pylons look droopy, the saucer section out of place. Yet, at the same time when I see it zooming around in the trailer, It takes on a totally new life and somehow becomes much more identifiable as a constitution class starship. It's like the motion actually breathes a bit of sparkle and life into the otherwise, saggy model, leading me to believe that we should all take a deep breath, and wait to judge the ship when we can see it, to be blunt, on a really big screen, and for more than a few frames at a time.
No it's just poorly designed.
That's it. I've never seen a bad angle on ships...only bad designs.

Like the NX-01: The ugliest piece of crap, EVER.
And this rivals it in-every-sense-of-the-word, rivals...

This ship isn't beautiful.
It isn't elegant
It's not Trek Worthy.
It's wrong...it's a tease, like they've said. It's parady. All of you know it, but you're willing to love ugly if it gets you another Trek film.

I want a Trek Film.
But this ship is still ugly.
__________________

Reply With Quote