The Official Star Trek Movie Forum

The Official Star Trek Movie Forum (http://www.startrekmovie.com/forums/index.php)
-   Star Trek XI: The Movie (http://www.startrekmovie.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Theory of Shatner in the new Trek : REVISITED!!!! (http://www.startrekmovie.com/forums/showthread.php?t=11132)

BlackBox 05-23-2011 01:44 PM

Theory of Shatner in the new Trek : REVISITED!!!!
 
I'm sure all of u are aware of the movement to uncover the truth about Shatner in the new Trek which some in the media have derisively dubbed "Shaters". But the truth is that the evidence keeps getting stronger that Shat is in the new Trek, or at least hidden in scenes on the DVD. Notice, also, that there has been NO DENIAL of this from either Paramount or JJ.

I know what you're thinking: "of course Shat is in the new Trek, but where is the proof?" But just use your logic: what do Paramount and JJ have to gain in making it hard to prove Shat is in the new Trek? That's right: $$$. This controversy keeps people buying and watching the DVDs, because --- as all of you know --- Shat might be on some of the DVD copies and not others.

Furthermore, why would they not put Shat in the new Trek? It wouldn't make sense. Shat is like the Elvis of the movie business; anything he's in becomes an instant blockbuster, even if some of the people aren't sure whether or not he's in; the rumor is enough. Plus, we all know that JJ is a legacy hound: he wants to go down in history as one of the greatest directors/producers ever. There is no way that can happen unless he directs/produces Shat in at least two or three movies.

omegaman 05-23-2011 04:03 PM

Blackbox… that's funny…

MagaditH 05-24-2011 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackBox (Post 315499)

Shat is like the Elvis of the movie business; anything he's in becomes an instant blockbuster, even if some of the people aren't sure whether or not he's in; the rumor is enough.

Ummm... National Lampoon's Loaded Weapon 1?

NCC-73515 05-24-2011 10:57 AM

The box again.

Captain Tom Coughlin 05-25-2011 09:13 AM

:lol::lol::lol::lol:

Futureguy 05-25-2011 04:32 PM

Of course it would not be a big problem to shoot some extra scenes with Shatner during the next movie and "edit" them into the last......instant satisfaction to all! lol

omegaman 05-25-2011 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Futureguy (Post 315520)
Of course it would not be a big problem to shoot some extra scenes with Shatner during the next movie and "edit" them into the last......instant satisfaction to all! lol

That would spoil the movie… it's perfect now. :thumbdown:

BlackBox 05-25-2011 10:46 PM

its still not too late to use cgi and replace Pine with Shat completely, or at least superimpose Shat's face over Pine's

horatio 05-26-2011 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackBox (Post 315524)
its still not too late to use cgi and replace Pine with Shat completely, or at least superimpose Shat's face over Pine's

Pine's body and Shatner's face, that would make a scary alien. :D

BlackBox 05-27-2011 01:50 AM

they could make it work like they did in Black Swan. Also, in the next Trek, they could just replace Pine with Shat entirely. Some people say he's too old, but they underrate Shat's acting genius. Think about it: Shat has played young-Kirk before, he has most experience with the role, why couldn't he do it again? It's not logical to say that he couldn't


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 by Paramount Pictures. STAR TREK and all related
marks and logos are trademarks of CBS Studios Inc. All Rights Reserved.