![]() |
Good thing that MGM did not have Star Trek Rights
With MGM now (officially) putting Bond on indefinite suspension :thumbdown: due to their cash crisis, we may not see Bond or even any further Stargate derivatives for some time. Even when particular movies about Bond were not great, they were good entertainment, especially for marathon showings.
|
Yikes!
|
Quote:
Paramount shared Star Trek with Spyglass for the latest movie... James Bond has always been a moneymaker for MGM/United Artists, it seems odd they'd shelf something that could help their difficulties. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Plus, a James Bond film is these days an exorbitantly costly film (Quantum was reported to cost $200 million before promotion/advertising was spent on as well) to produce and would do very little to solve their issues on it's own. And at that kind of cost it's 2008 earnings of less than $600 million are unlikely to have made it profitable on it's theatrical run, though I have no idea what it earned on DVD/Blu-Ray etc. The rights may have to transfer to get things going again. |
Quote:
|
If StarGate were given up, I'd venture that 20th Century Fox would buy it, simply based on the notion that some of the StarGate SG-1 and StarGate Atlantis DVD's were released through 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment as well as MGM.
|
Quote:
|
This explains the state of the Stargate Empire.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:59 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 by Paramount Pictures. STAR TREK and all related
marks and logos are trademarks of CBS Studios Inc. All Rights Reserved.