The Official Star Trek Movie Forum

The Official Star Trek Movie Forum (http://www.startrekmovie.com/forums/index.php)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://www.startrekmovie.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Is JJ a clone of Steven Spielberg? (http://www.startrekmovie.com/forums/showthread.php?t=10685)

omegaman 05-03-2010 04:46 PM

Is JJ a clone of Steven Spielberg?
 
1 Attachment(s)
Add a beard and a little makeup to JJ and he could pass for Steven. They even wear similar glasses?

TNG_Trekman 05-03-2010 05:07 PM

I hope so :D

kevin 05-03-2010 09:57 PM

Interesting.

horatio 05-04-2010 09:57 AM

Abrams might be an easy-going guy to work with and a technically versatile moviemaker but is not interested in good themes. The earliest movies of Spielberg I am familiar with are Duel and Close Encounters, timeless movies, big cinema. Abrams will never play in that league.

kevin 05-04-2010 11:36 AM

I would have more issue if it was Abrams who was suggesting that he was such in the first place, but since it's really others who are doing that I think the comparisons are pretty pointless.

A lot have people have been compared to Spielberg over the years but ultimately he is rather unique and it's always an unwise comparison. At best, he belongs in the company of Lucas, Ford Coppola etc and those directors that emerged in the 1970s and then went in different directions, rather than the directors of today.

Spielberg has his flaws and I'm not in awe of his films as I used to be because his films are starting to vary more widely in worthiness - but he is relatively incomparable as a director of pure cinema.

Abrams is fine at what he does, but I wouldn't call him a successor.

starwarsrcks 05-04-2010 12:24 PM

JJ Abrams to me is a genius and brilliant you know why he made Star Trek yes I know worshipping him.

jla1987 05-04-2010 09:24 PM

Speaking of Abrams, looks like a Cloverfield prequel is on the way.

http://trekweb.com/articles/2010/05/...verfield.shtml

kevin 05-05-2010 09:01 AM

Sounds interesting - I would have enjoyed Cloverfield more if not for the too heavY shaky cam employed by Matt Reeves.

It was a pretty good low-budget flick.

If Super 8 is a real film (if it is I hope they keep that title!) and is shot the same way though, I doubt I would go to the cinema too see it. The headaches cause by Cloverfield's camera-work made me have to leave before the film was over.

jla1987 05-05-2010 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kevin (Post 303395)
Sounds interesting - I would have enjoyed Cloverfield more if not for the too heavY shaky cam employed by Matt Reeves.

It was a pretty good low-budget flick.

If Super 8 is a real film (if it is I hope they keep that title!) and is shot the same way though, I doubt I would go to the cinema too see it. The headaches cause by Cloverfield's camera-work made me have to leave before the film was over.

Now, he's saying it has nothing to do with Cloverfield...
http://trekmovie.com/2010/05/05/jj-a...h-cloverfield/

TNG_Trekman 05-06-2010 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by horatio (Post 303362)
Abrams might be an easy-going guy to work with and a technically versatile moviemaker but is not interested in good themes. The earliest movies of Spielberg I am familiar with are Duel and Close Encounters, timeless movies, big cinema. Abrams will never play in that league.

Never say never :001_tongue:


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 by Paramount Pictures. STAR TREK and all related
marks and logos are trademarks of CBS Studios Inc. All Rights Reserved.